s390/net: replace in_irq() with in_hardirq()
authorChangbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Sat, 14 Aug 2021 01:03:34 +0000 (09:03 +0800)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:15:47 +0000 (11:15 +0100)
Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new
macro in_hardirq().

Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c

index 377e368..06281a0 100644 (file)
@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ again:
                        if (do_debug_ccw)
                        ctcmpc_dumpit((char *)&ch->ccw[0],
                                        sizeof(struct ccw1) * 3);
-               dolock = !in_irq();
+               dolock = !in_hardirq();
                if (dolock)
                        spin_lock_irqsave(
                                get_ccwdev_lock(ch->cdev), saveflags);
index 19ee91a..f0436f5 100644 (file)
@@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ static void mpc_action_side_xid(fsm_instance *fsm, void *arg, int side)
        CTCM_D3_DUMP((char *)ch->xid, XID2_LENGTH);
        CTCM_D3_DUMP((char *)ch->xid_id, 4);
 
-       if (!in_irq()) {
+       if (!in_hardirq()) {
                         /* Such conditional locking is a known problem for
                          * sparse because its static undeterministic.
                          * Warnings should be ignored here. */