io-wq: Fix io_wq_worker_affinity()
authorPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:44:50 +0000 (11:44 +0200)
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 01:30:40 +0000 (19:30 -0600)
Do not include private headers and do not frob in internals.

On top of that, while the previous code restores the affinity, it
doesn't ensure the task actually moves there if it was running,
leading to the fun situation that it can be observed running outside
of its allowed mask for potentially significant time.

Use the proper API instead.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YG7QkiUzlEbW85TU@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
fs/io-wq.c

index b1c093d..49def87 100644 (file)
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/tracehook.h>
 
-#include "../kernel/sched/sched.h"
 #include "io-wq.h"
 
 #define WORKER_IDLE_TIMEOUT    (5 * HZ)
@@ -1064,14 +1063,8 @@ void io_wq_put_and_exit(struct io_wq *wq)
 
 static bool io_wq_worker_affinity(struct io_worker *worker, void *data)
 {
-       struct task_struct *task = worker->task;
-       struct rq_flags rf;
-       struct rq *rq;
-
-       rq = task_rq_lock(task, &rf);
-       do_set_cpus_allowed(task, cpumask_of_node(worker->wqe->node));
-       task->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
-       task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &rf);
+       set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpumask_of_node(worker->wqe->node));
+
        return false;
 }