radix-tree: change naming conventions in radix_tree_shrink
authorMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Sat, 21 May 2016 00:03:33 +0000 (17:03 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sat, 21 May 2016 00:58:30 +0000 (17:58 -0700)
Use the more standard 'node' and 'child' instead of 'to_free' and
'slot'.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
lib/radix-tree.c

index b65c830..4b4a2a2 100644 (file)
@@ -1395,37 +1395,37 @@ static inline bool radix_tree_shrink(struct radix_tree_root *root)
        bool shrunk = false;
 
        for (;;) {
-               struct radix_tree_node *to_free = root->rnode;
-               struct radix_tree_node *slot;
+               struct radix_tree_node *node = root->rnode;
+               struct radix_tree_node *child;
 
-               if (!radix_tree_is_internal_node(to_free))
+               if (!radix_tree_is_internal_node(node))
                        break;
-               to_free = entry_to_node(to_free);
+               node = entry_to_node(node);
 
                /*
                 * The candidate node has more than one child, or its child
                 * is not at the leftmost slot, or the child is a multiorder
                 * entry, we cannot shrink.
                 */
-               if (to_free->count != 1)
+               if (node->count != 1)
                        break;
-               slot = to_free->slots[0];
-               if (!slot)
+               child = node->slots[0];
+               if (!child)
                        break;
-               if (!radix_tree_is_internal_node(slot) && to_free->shift)
+               if (!radix_tree_is_internal_node(child) && node->shift)
                        break;
 
-               if (radix_tree_is_internal_node(slot))
-                       entry_to_node(slot)->parent = NULL;
+               if (radix_tree_is_internal_node(child))
+                       entry_to_node(child)->parent = NULL;
 
                /*
                 * We don't need rcu_assign_pointer(), since we are simply
                 * moving the node from one part of the tree to another: if it
                 * was safe to dereference the old pointer to it
-                * (to_free->slots[0]), it will be safe to dereference the new
+                * (node->slots[0]), it will be safe to dereference the new
                 * one (root->rnode) as far as dependent read barriers go.
                 */
-               root->rnode = slot;
+               root->rnode = child;
 
                /*
                 * We have a dilemma here. The node's slot[0] must not be
@@ -1445,10 +1445,10 @@ static inline bool radix_tree_shrink(struct radix_tree_root *root)
                 * also results in a stale slot). So tag the slot as indirect
                 * to force callers to retry.
                 */
-               if (!radix_tree_is_internal_node(slot))
-                       to_free->slots[0] = RADIX_TREE_RETRY;
+               if (!radix_tree_is_internal_node(child))
+                       node->slots[0] = RADIX_TREE_RETRY;
 
-               radix_tree_node_free(to_free);
+               radix_tree_node_free(node);
                shrunk = true;
        }