io-wq: move nr_running and worker_refs out of wqe->lock protection
authorHao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:55:54 +0000 (20:55 +0800)
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:10:43 +0000 (13:10 -0600)
We don't need to protect nr_running and worker_refs by wqe->lock, so
narrow the range of raw_spin_lock_irq - raw_spin_unlock_irq

Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210810125554.99229-1-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
fs/io-wq.c

index 4ce83bb..8da9bb1 100644 (file)
@@ -256,16 +256,17 @@ static void io_wqe_wake_worker(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wqe_acct *acct)
 
                raw_spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
                if (acct->nr_workers < acct->max_workers) {
-                       atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
-                       atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
                        if (!acct->nr_workers)
                                first = true;
                        acct->nr_workers++;
                        do_create = true;
                }
                raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
-               if (do_create)
+               if (do_create) {
+                       atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
+                       atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
                        create_io_worker(wqe->wq, wqe, acct->index, first);
+               }
        }
 }