gpio: mlxbf2: Drop wrong use of ACPI_PTR()

ACPI_PTR() is more harmful than helpful. For example, in this case
if CONFIG_ACPI=n, the ID table left unused which is not what we want.

Instead of adding ifdeffery here and there, drop ACPI_PTR() and
replace acpi.h with mod_devicetable.h.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Asmaa Mnehi <asmaa@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
index 68c471c..8e6f780 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
-#include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/bitfield.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
@@ -8,6 +7,7 @@
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/ioport.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm.h>
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match);
 static struct platform_driver mlxbf2_gpio_driver = {
        .driver = {
                .name = "mlxbf2_gpio",
-               .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match),
+               .acpi_match_table = mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match,
                .pm = &mlxbf2_pm_ops,
        },
        .probe    = mlxbf2_gpio_probe,