This is a s390 port of commit
548acf19234d ("x86/mm: Expand the
exception table logic to allow new handling options"), which is needed
for implementing BPF_PROBE_MEM on s390.
The new handler field is made 64-bit in order to allow pointing from
dynamically allocated entries to handlers in kernel text. Unlike on x86,
NULL is used instead of ex_handler_default. This is because exception
tables are used by boot/text_dma.S, and it would be a pain to preserve
ex_handler_default.
The new infrastructure is ignored in early_pgm_check_handler, since
there is no pt_regs.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
#ifndef __S390_EXTABLE_H
#define __S390_EXTABLE_H
+
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+
/*
- * The exception table consists of pairs of addresses: the first is the
- * address of an instruction that is allowed to fault, and the second is
- * the address at which the program should continue. No registers are
- * modified, so it is entirely up to the continuation code to figure out
- * what to do.
+ * The exception table consists of three addresses:
+ *
+ * - Address of an instruction that is allowed to fault.
+ * - Address at which the program should continue.
+ * - Optional address of handler that takes pt_regs * argument and runs in
+ * interrupt context.
+ *
+ * No registers are modified, so it is entirely up to the continuation code
+ * to figure out what to do.
*
* All the routines below use bits of fixup code that are out of line
* with the main instruction path. This means when everything is well,
struct exception_table_entry
{
int insn, fixup;
+ long handler;
};
extern struct exception_table_entry *__start_dma_ex_table;
return (unsigned long)&x->fixup + x->fixup;
}
+typedef bool (*ex_handler_t)(const struct exception_table_entry *,
+ struct pt_regs *);
+
+static inline ex_handler_t
+ex_fixup_handler(const struct exception_table_entry *x)
+{
+ if (likely(!x->handler))
+ return NULL;
+ return (ex_handler_t)((unsigned long)&x->handler + x->handler);
+}
+
+static inline bool ex_handle(const struct exception_table_entry *x,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ ex_handler_t handler = ex_fixup_handler(x);
+
+ if (unlikely(handler))
+ return handler(x, regs);
+ regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(x);
+ return true;
+}
+
#define ARCH_HAS_RELATIVE_EXTABLE
+static inline void swap_ex_entry_fixup(struct exception_table_entry *a,
+ struct exception_table_entry *b,
+ struct exception_table_entry tmp,
+ int delta)
+{
+ a->fixup = b->fixup + delta;
+ b->fixup = tmp.fixup - delta;
+ a->handler = b->handler + delta;
+ b->handler = tmp.handler - delta;
+}
+
#endif
#define __EX_TABLE(_section, _fault, _target) \
stringify_in_c(.section _section,"a";) \
- stringify_in_c(.align 4;) \
+ stringify_in_c(.align 8;) \
stringify_in_c(.long (_fault) - .;) \
stringify_in_c(.long (_target) - .;) \
+ stringify_in_c(.quad 0;) \
stringify_in_c(.previous)
#define EX_TABLE(_fault, _target) \
* zero, try to fix up.
*/
entry = s390_search_extables(regs->psw.addr);
- if (entry) {
- regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(entry);
+ if (entry && ex_handle(entry, regs))
return 1;
- }
/*
* fixup_exception() could not handle it,
} else {
const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
fixup = s390_search_extables(regs->psw.addr);
- if (fixup)
- regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(fixup);
- else {
+ if (!fixup || !ex_handle(fixup, regs))
die(regs, str);
- }
}
}
case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_NONE:
fixup = s390_search_extables(regs->psw.addr);
if (fixup)
- regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(fixup);
+ ex_handle(fixup, regs);
break;
case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_WARN:
break;
/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
fixup = s390_search_extables(regs->psw.addr);
- if (fixup) {
- regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(fixup);
+ if (fixup && ex_handle(fixup, regs))
return;
- }
/*
* Oops. The kernel tried to access some bad page. We'll have to
}
}
+static void s390_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) {
+ char *loc = extab_image + i;
+ uint64_t handler;
+
+ w(r((uint32_t *)loc) + i, (uint32_t *)loc);
+ w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) + (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4));
+ /*
+ * 0 is a special self-relative handler value, which means that
+ * handler should be ignored. It is safe, because it means that
+ * handler field points to itself, which should never happen.
+ * When creating extable-relative values, keep it as 0, since
+ * this should never occur either: it would mean that handler
+ * field points to the first extable entry.
+ */
+ handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+ if (handler)
+ handler += i + 8;
+ w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+ }
+
+ qsort(extab_image, image_size / 16, 16, compare_relative_table);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) {
+ char *loc = extab_image + i;
+ uint64_t handler;
+
+ w(r((uint32_t *)loc) - i, (uint32_t *)loc);
+ w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) - (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4));
+ handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+ if (handler)
+ handler -= i + 8;
+ w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+ }
+}
+
static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr)
{
int rc = -1;
custom_sort = x86_sort_relative_table;
break;
case EM_S390:
+ custom_sort = s390_sort_relative_table;
+ break;
case EM_AARCH64:
case EM_PARISC:
case EM_PPC:
projects / linux-2.6-microblaze.git / commitdiff