From 4b04e0decd2518e54e3f371abf3d883b3198663d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sumanth Korikkar Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:27:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] perf test: Fix basic bpf filtering test BPF basic filtering test fails on s390x (when vmlinux debuginfo is utilized instead of /proc/kallsyms) Info: - bpf_probe_load installs the bpf code at do_epoll_wait. - For s390x, do_epoll_wait resolves to 3 functions including inlines. found inline addr: 0x43769e Probe point found: __s390_sys_epoll_wait+6 found inline addr: 0x437290 Probe point found: do_epoll_wait+0 found inline addr: 0x4375d6 Probe point found: __se_sys_epoll_wait+6 - add_bpf_event creates evsel for every probe in a BPF object. This results in 3 evsels. Solution: - Expected result = 50% of the samples to be collected from epoll_wait * number of entries present in the evlist. Committer testing: # perf test 42 42: BPF filter : 42.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok 42.2: BPF pinning : Ok 42.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok 42.4: BPF relocation checker : Ok # Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar Reviewed-by: Thomas Richter Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Sven Schnelle LPU-Reference: 20200817072754.58344-1-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c index 5d20bf8397f0..cd77e334e577 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int do_test(struct bpf_object *obj, int (*func)(void), perf_mmap__read_done(&md->core); } - if (count != expect) { + if (count != expect * evlist->core.nr_entries) { pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect, expected %d, got %d samples\n", expect, count); goto out_delete_evlist; } -- 2.20.1