bpf: Switch bpf_map ref counter to atomic64_t so bpf_map_inc() never fails

bpf: Switch bpf_map ref counter to atomic64_t so bpf_map_inc() never fails

92117d8443bc ("bpf: fix refcnt overflow") turned refcounting of bpf_map into
potentially failing operation, when refcount reaches BPF_MAX_REFCNT limit
(32k). Due to using 32-bit counter, it's possible in practice to overflow
refcounter and make it wrap around to 0, causing erroneous map free, while
there are still references to it, causing use-after-free problems.

But having a failing refcounting operations are problematic in some cases. One
example is mmap() interface. After establishing initial memory-mapping, user
is allowed to arbitrarily map/remap/unmap parts of mapped memory, arbitrarily
splitting it into multiple non-contiguous regions. All this happening without
any control from the users of mmap subsystem. Rather mmap subsystem sends
notifications to original creator of memory mapping through open/close
callbacks, which are optionally specified during initial memory mapping
creation. These callbacks are used to maintain accurate refcount for bpf_map
(see next patch in this series). The problem is that open() callback is not
supposed to fail, because memory-mapped resource is set up and properly
referenced. This is posing a problem for using memory-mapping with BPF maps.

One solution to this is to maintain separate refcount for just memory-mappings
and do single bpf_map_inc/bpf_map_put when it goes from/to zero, respectively.
There are similar use cases in current work on tcp-bpf, necessitating extra
counter as well. This seems like a rather unfortunate and ugly solution that
doesn't scale well to various new use cases.

Another approach to solve this is to use non-failing refcount_t type, which
uses 32-bit counter internally, but, once reaching overflow state at UINT_MAX,
stays there. This utlimately causes memory leak, but prevents use after free.

But given refcounting is not the most performance-critical operation with BPF
maps (it's not used from running BPF program code), we can also just switch to
64-bit counter that can't overflow in practice, potentially disadvantaging
32-bit platforms a tiny bit. This simplifies semantics and allows above
described scenarios to not worry about failing refcount increment operation.

In terms of struct bpf_map size, we are still good and use the same amount of
space:

BEFORE (3 cache lines, 8 bytes of padding at the end):
struct bpf_map {
	const struct bpf_map_ops  * ops __attribute__((__aligned__(64))); /*     0     8 */
	struct bpf_map *           inner_map_meta;       /*     8     8 */
	void *                     security;             /*    16     8 */
	enum bpf_map_type  map_type;                     /*    24     4 */
	u32                        key_size;             /*    28     4 */
	u32                        value_size;           /*    32     4 */
	u32                        max_entries;          /*    36     4 */
	u32                        map_flags;            /*    40     4 */
	int                        spin_lock_off;        /*    44     4 */
	u32                        id;                   /*    48     4 */
	int                        numa_node;            /*    52     4 */
	u32                        btf_key_type_id;      /*    56     4 */
	u32                        btf_value_type_id;    /*    60     4 */
	/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
	struct btf *               btf;                  /*    64     8 */
	struct bpf_map_memory memory;                    /*    72    16 */
	bool                       unpriv_array;         /*    88     1 */
	bool                       frozen;               /*    89     1 */

	/* XXX 38 bytes hole, try to pack */

	/* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) --- */
	atomic_t                   refcnt __attribute__((__aligned__(64))); /*   128     4 */
	atomic_t                   usercnt;              /*   132     4 */
	struct work_struct work;                         /*   136    32 */
	char                       name[16];             /*   168    16 */

	/* size: 192, cachelines: 3, members: 21 */
	/* sum members: 146, holes: 1, sum holes: 38 */
	/* padding: 8 */
	/* forced alignments: 2, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 38 */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(64)));

AFTER (same 3 cache lines, no extra padding now):
struct bpf_map {
	const struct bpf_map_ops  * ops __attribute__((__aligned__(64))); /*     0     8 */
	struct bpf_map *           inner_map_meta;       /*     8     8 */
	void *                     security;             /*    16     8 */
	enum bpf_map_type  map_type;                     /*    24     4 */
	u32                        key_size;             /*    28     4 */
	u32                        value_size;           /*    32     4 */
	u32                        max_entries;          /*    36     4 */
	u32                        map_flags;            /*    40     4 */
	int                        spin_lock_off;        /*    44     4 */
	u32                        id;                   /*    48     4 */
	int                        numa_node;            /*    52     4 */
	u32                        btf_key_type_id;      /*    56     4 */
	u32                        btf_value_type_id;    /*    60     4 */
	/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
	struct btf *               btf;                  /*    64     8 */
	struct bpf_map_memory memory;                    /*    72    16 */
	bool                       unpriv_array;         /*    88     1 */
	bool                       frozen;               /*    89     1 */

	/* XXX 38 bytes hole, try to pack */

	/* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) --- */
	atomic64_t                 refcnt __attribute__((__aligned__(64))); /*   128     8 */
	atomic64_t                 usercnt;              /*   136     8 */
	struct work_struct work;                         /*   144    32 */
	char                       name[16];             /*   176    16 */

	/* size: 192, cachelines: 3, members: 21 */
	/* sum members: 154, holes: 1, sum holes: 38 */
	/* forced alignments: 2, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 38 */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(64)));

This patch, while modifying all users of bpf_map_inc, also cleans up its
interface to match bpf_map_put with separate operations for bpf_map_inc and
bpf_map_inc_with_uref (to match bpf_map_put and bpf_map_put_with_uref,
respectively). Also, given there are no users of bpf_map_inc_not_zero
specifying uref=true, remove uref flag and default to uref=false internally.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191117172806.2195367-2-andriin@fb.com