if (moved_len < old_len) {
err = -ENOMEM;
} else if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->mremap) {
- err = vma->vm_ops->mremap(new_vma, flags);
+ err = vma->vm_ops->mremap(new_vma);
}
if (unlikely(err)) {
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
- if (flags & MREMAP_DONTUNMAP && (!vma_is_anonymous(vma) ||
- vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
+ if ((flags & MREMAP_DONTUNMAP) &&
+ (vma->vm_flags & (VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_PFNMAP)))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
* So, to avoid such scenario we can pre-compute if the whole
* operation has high chances to success map-wise.
* Worst-scenario case is when both vma's (new_addr and old_addr) get
- * split in 3 before unmaping it.
+ * split in 3 before unmapping it.
* That means 2 more maps (1 for each) to the ones we already hold.
* Check whether current map count plus 2 still leads us to 4 maps below
* the threshold, otherwise return -ENOMEM here to be more safe.