* this smp_load_acquire(), this is guaranteed because the smp_load_acquire()
* is inside a spin_lock() and after a write from 0 to non-zero a
* spin_lock()+spin_unlock() is done.
+ * To prevent the compiler/cpu temporarily writing 0 to use_global_lock,
+ * READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() is used.
*
* 2) queue.status: (SEM_BARRIER_2)
* Initialization is done while holding sem_lock(), so no further barrier is
* Nothing to do, just reset the
* counter until we return to simple mode.
*/
- sma->use_global_lock = USE_GLOBAL_LOCK_HYSTERESIS;
+ WRITE_ONCE(sma->use_global_lock, USE_GLOBAL_LOCK_HYSTERESIS);
return;
}
- sma->use_global_lock = USE_GLOBAL_LOCK_HYSTERESIS;
+ WRITE_ONCE(sma->use_global_lock, USE_GLOBAL_LOCK_HYSTERESIS);
for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++) {
sem = &sma->sems[i];
/* See SEM_BARRIER_1 for purpose/pairing */
smp_store_release(&sma->use_global_lock, 0);
} else {
- sma->use_global_lock--;
+ WRITE_ONCE(sma->use_global_lock,
+ sma->use_global_lock-1);
}
}
* Initial check for use_global_lock. Just an optimization,
* no locking, no memory barrier.
*/
- if (!sma->use_global_lock) {
+ if (!READ_ONCE(sma->use_global_lock)) {
/*
* It appears that no complex operation is around.
* Acquire the per-semaphore lock.
un->semid = -1;
list_del_rcu(&un->list_proc);
spin_unlock(&un->ulp->lock);
- kfree_rcu(un, rcu);
+ kvfree_rcu(un, rcu);
}
/* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */
rcu_read_unlock();
/* step 2: allocate new undo structure */
- new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sem_undo) + sizeof(short)*nsems, GFP_KERNEL);
+ new = kvzalloc(sizeof(struct sem_undo) + sizeof(short)*nsems,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new) {
ipc_rcu_putref(&sma->sem_perm, sem_rcu_free);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (!ipc_valid_object(&sma->sem_perm)) {
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
- kfree(new);
+ kvfree(new);
un = ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
goto out;
}
*/
un = lookup_undo(ulp, semid);
if (un) {
- kfree(new);
+ kvfree(new);
goto success;
}
/* step 5: initialize & link new undo structure */
rcu_read_unlock();
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
- kfree_rcu(un, rcu);
+ kvfree_rcu(un, rcu);
}
kfree(ulp);
}
/*
* The proc interface isn't aware of sem_lock(), it calls
- * ipc_lock_object() directly (in sysvipc_find_ipc).
+ * ipc_lock_object(), i.e. spin_lock(&sma->sem_perm.lock).
+ * (in sysvipc_find_ipc)
* In order to stay compatible with sem_lock(), we must
* enter / leave complex_mode.
*/