From fc84e1f941b91221092da5b3102ec82da24c5673 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:27:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair In bfq_insert_request() we unlock bfqd->lock only to call trace_block_rq_insert() and then lock bfqd->lock again. This is really pointless since tracing is disabled if we really care about performance and even if the tracepoint is enabled, it is a quick call. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-5-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 1fc4d4628fba..19082e14f3c1 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -6150,11 +6150,8 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq, return; } - spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock); - trace_block_rq_insert(rq); - spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock); bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq); if (!bfqq || at_head) { if (at_head) -- 2.20.1