From b19fdb16fb2167c6bc9ee8fbc0c1d2d4fd3e2eb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Ian King Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:57:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] sched/headers: Remove comment referring to rq::cpu_load, since this has been removed There is a comment that refers to cpu_load, however, this cpu_load was removed with: 55627e3cd22c ("sched/core: Remove rq->cpu_load[]") ... back in 2019. The comment does not make sense with respect to this removed array, so remove the comment. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010155744.1381065-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com --- kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index faf9031422e1..65cad0e5729e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -948,10 +948,6 @@ struct rq { /* runqueue lock: */ raw_spinlock_t __lock; - /* - * nr_running and cpu_load should be in the same cacheline because - * remote CPUs use both these fields when doing load calculation. - */ unsigned int nr_running; #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING unsigned int nr_numa_running; -- 2.20.1