From 6df1db6b542436c6d429caa66e1045862fa36155 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Begunkov Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 22:15:06 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: fix mis-refcounting linked timeouts io_prep_linked_timeout() sets REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT altering refcounting of the following linked request. After that someone should call io_queue_linked_timeout(), otherwise a submission reference of the linked timeout won't be ever dropped. That's what happens in io_steal_work() if io-wq decides to postpone linked request with io_wqe_enqueue(). io_queue_linked_timeout() can also be potentially called twice without synchronisation during re-submission, e.g. io_rw_resubmit(). There are the rules, whoever did io_prep_linked_timeout() must also call io_queue_linked_timeout(). To not do it twice, io_prep_linked_timeout() will return non NULL only for the first call. That's controlled by REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT flag. Also kill REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT. Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- fs/io_uring.c | 33 +++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index 2b849984bae5..cf1b3d4ac241 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -538,7 +538,6 @@ enum { REQ_F_POLLED_BIT, REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED_BIT, REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE_BIT, - REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT_BIT, REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED_BIT, REQ_F_TASK_PINNED_BIT, @@ -586,8 +585,6 @@ enum { REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED = BIT(REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED_BIT), /* doesn't need file table for this request */ REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE = BIT(REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE_BIT), - /* needs to queue linked timeout */ - REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT = BIT(REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT_BIT), /* io_wq_work is initialized */ REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED = BIT(REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED_BIT), /* req->task is refcounted */ @@ -1842,7 +1839,7 @@ static void io_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req) static struct io_wq_work *io_steal_work(struct io_kiocb *req) { - struct io_kiocb *timeout, *nxt = NULL; + struct io_kiocb *nxt; /* * A ref is owned by io-wq in which context we're. So, if that's the @@ -1853,13 +1850,7 @@ static struct io_wq_work *io_steal_work(struct io_kiocb *req) return NULL; nxt = io_req_find_next(req); - if (!nxt) - return NULL; - - timeout = io_prep_linked_timeout(nxt); - if (timeout) - nxt->flags |= REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT; - return &nxt->work; + return nxt ? &nxt->work : NULL; } /* @@ -5702,24 +5693,15 @@ static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe, return 0; } -static void io_arm_async_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req) -{ - struct io_kiocb *link; - - /* link head's timeout is queued in io_queue_async_work() */ - if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT)) - return; - - link = list_first_entry(&req->link_list, struct io_kiocb, link_list); - io_queue_linked_timeout(link); -} - static struct io_wq_work *io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work) { struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work); + struct io_kiocb *timeout; int ret = 0; - io_arm_async_linked_timeout(req); + timeout = io_prep_linked_timeout(req); + if (timeout) + io_queue_linked_timeout(timeout); /* if NO_CANCEL is set, we must still run the work */ if ((work->flags & (IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL|IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL)) == @@ -5893,8 +5875,7 @@ static struct io_kiocb *io_prep_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req) if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD)) return NULL; - /* for polled retry, if flag is set, we already went through here */ - if (req->flags & REQ_F_POLLED) + if (req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT) return NULL; nxt = list_first_entry_or_null(&req->link_list, struct io_kiocb, -- 2.20.1