From 516095cdf07af0c7223681079d87e9c42c7cf599 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:20:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: move lockdep class setting out of extent_io_tree_init The per-inode file extent tree was added in 41a2ee75aab0 ("btrfs: introduce per-inode file extent tree"), it's the only tree type that requires the lockdep class. Move it to the file where it is actually used. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c | 10 ---------- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c index 76061245a46b..56be64e656da 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c @@ -78,14 +78,6 @@ static inline void __btrfs_debug_check_extent_io_range(const char *caller, #define btrfs_debug_check_extent_io_range(c, s, e) do {} while (0) #endif -/* - * For the file_extent_tree, we want to hold the inode lock when we lookup and - * update the disk_i_size, but lockdep will complain because our io_tree we hold - * the tree lock and get the inode lock when setting delalloc. These two things - * are unrelated, so make a class for the file_extent_tree so we don't get the - * two locking patterns mixed up. - */ -static struct lock_class_key file_extent_tree_class; void extent_io_tree_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_io_tree *tree, unsigned int owner) @@ -95,8 +87,6 @@ void extent_io_tree_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, spin_lock_init(&tree->lock); tree->inode = NULL; tree->owner = owner; - if (owner == IO_TREE_INODE_FILE_EXTENT) - lockdep_set_class(&tree->lock, &file_extent_tree_class); } /* diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 140e9c045cf1..7cb5139e3d7f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ struct data_reloc_warn { int mirror_num; }; +/* + * For the file_extent_tree, we want to hold the inode lock when we lookup and + * update the disk_i_size, but lockdep will complain because our io_tree we hold + * the tree lock and get the inode lock when setting delalloc. These two things + * are unrelated, so make a class for the file_extent_tree so we don't get the + * two locking patterns mixed up. + */ +static struct lock_class_key file_extent_tree_class; + static const struct inode_operations btrfs_dir_inode_operations; static const struct inode_operations btrfs_symlink_inode_operations; static const struct inode_operations btrfs_special_inode_operations; @@ -8506,6 +8515,8 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) ei->io_tree.inode = ei; extent_io_tree_init(fs_info, &ei->file_extent_tree, IO_TREE_INODE_FILE_EXTENT); + /* Lockdep class is set only for the file extent tree. */ + lockdep_set_class(&ei->file_extent_tree.lock, &file_extent_tree_class); mutex_init(&ei->log_mutex); spin_lock_init(&ei->ordered_tree_lock); ei->ordered_tree = RB_ROOT; -- 2.20.1