From 09772d92cd5ad998b0d5f6f46cd1658f8cb698cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 23:06:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: avoid retpoline for lookup/update/delete calls on maps While some of the BPF map lookup helpers provide a ->map_gen_lookup() callback for inlining the map lookup altogether it is not available for every map, so the remaining ones have to call bpf_map_lookup_elem() helper which does a dispatch to map->ops->map_lookup_elem(). In times of retpolines, this will control and trap speculative execution rather than letting it do its work for the indirect call and will therefore cause a slowdown. Likewise, bpf_map_update_elem() and bpf_map_delete_elem() do not have an inlined version and need to call into their map->ops->map_update_elem() resp. map->ops->map_delete_elem() handlers. Before: # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1 0: (bf) r2 = r10 1: (07) r2 += -8 2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r2 +0) = 0 3: (18) r1 = map[id:1] 5: (85) call __htab_map_lookup_elem#232656 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+4 7: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r0 +35) 8: (55) if r1 != 0x0 goto pc+1 9: (72) *(u8 *)(r0 +35) = 1 10: (07) r0 += 56 11: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+4 12: (bf) r2 = r0 13: (18) r1 = map[id:1] 15: (85) call bpf_map_delete_elem#215008 <-- indirect call via 16: (95) exit helper After: # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1 0: (bf) r2 = r10 1: (07) r2 += -8 2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r2 +0) = 0 3: (18) r1 = map[id:1] 5: (85) call __htab_map_lookup_elem#233328 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+4 7: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r0 +35) 8: (55) if r1 != 0x0 goto pc+1 9: (72) *(u8 *)(r0 +35) = 1 10: (07) r0 += 56 11: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+4 12: (bf) r2 = r0 13: (18) r1 = map[id:1] 15: (85) call htab_lru_map_delete_elem#238240 <-- direct call 16: (95) exit In all three lookup/update/delete cases however we can use the actual address of the map callback directly if we find that there's only a single path with a map pointer leading to the helper call, meaning when the map pointer has not been poisoned from verifier side. Example code can be seen above for the delete case. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- include/linux/filter.h | 3 ++ kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 12 ++++++-- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 6fd375fe7079..8e60f1e9a702 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ struct xdp_buff; /* Function call */ +#define BPF_CAST_CALL(x) \ + ((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))(x)) + #define BPF_EMIT_CALL(FUNC) \ ((struct bpf_insn) { \ .code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, \ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c index b76828f23b49..3ca2198a6d22 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c @@ -503,7 +503,9 @@ static u32 htab_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn_buf) struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf; const int ret = BPF_REG_0; - *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))__htab_map_lookup_elem); + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem, + (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL)); + *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem)); *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 1); *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret, offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) + @@ -530,7 +532,9 @@ static u32 htab_lru_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, const int ret = BPF_REG_0; const int ref_reg = BPF_REG_1; - *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))__htab_map_lookup_elem); + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem, + (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL)); + *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem)); *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 4); *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, ref_reg, ret, offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node) + @@ -1369,7 +1373,9 @@ static u32 htab_of_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf; const int ret = BPF_REG_0; - *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))__htab_map_lookup_elem); + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem, + (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL)); + *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem)); *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 2); *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret, offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) + diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 4f4786ea2296..1dd6d5a7aa5b 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2421,8 +2421,11 @@ record_func_map(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta, struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx]; if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_tail_call && - func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) + func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem && + func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem && + func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem) return 0; + if (meta->map_ptr == NULL) { verbose(env, "kernel subsystem misconfigured verifier\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -5586,6 +5589,7 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi; const struct bpf_func_proto *fn; const int insn_cnt = prog->len; + const struct bpf_map_ops *ops; struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux; struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16]; struct bpf_prog *new_prog; @@ -5715,35 +5719,61 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } /* BPF_EMIT_CALL() assumptions in some of the map_gen_lookup - * handlers are currently limited to 64 bit only. + * and other inlining handlers are currently limited to 64 bit + * only. */ if (prog->jit_requested && BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && - insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) { + (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem || + insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem || + insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem)) { aux = &env->insn_aux_data[i + delta]; if (bpf_map_ptr_poisoned(aux)) goto patch_call_imm; map_ptr = BPF_MAP_PTR(aux->map_state); - if (!map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup) - goto patch_call_imm; + ops = map_ptr->ops; + if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem && + ops->map_gen_lookup) { + cnt = ops->map_gen_lookup(map_ptr, insn_buf); + if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) { + verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } - cnt = map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup(map_ptr, insn_buf); - if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) { - verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, + insn_buf, cnt); + if (!new_prog) + return -ENOMEM; - new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, - cnt); - if (!new_prog) - return -ENOMEM; + delta += cnt - 1; + env->prog = prog = new_prog; + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; + continue; + } - delta += cnt - 1; + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(ops->map_lookup_elem, + (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL)); + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(ops->map_delete_elem, + (int (*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL)); + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(ops->map_update_elem, + (int (*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, + u64 flags))NULL)); + switch (insn->imm) { + case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem: + insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_lookup_elem) - + __bpf_call_base; + continue; + case BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem: + insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_update_elem) - + __bpf_call_base; + continue; + case BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem: + insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_delete_elem) - + __bpf_call_base; + continue; + } - /* keep walking new program and skip insns we just inserted */ - env->prog = prog = new_prog; - insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; - continue; + goto patch_call_imm; } if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_redirect_map) { -- 2.20.1