Documentation: kunit: provide guidance for testing many inputs
usage.rst goes into a detailed section about faking out classes, but
currently lacks wording about how one might idiomatically test a range
of inputs.
Add a new chapter for "Common Patterns" and group "Isolating behvaior"
and this new section under there.
Give an example of how one might test a hash function via macros/helper
funcs and a table-driven test and very briefly discuss pros and cons.
Also highlight the KUNIT_EXPECT_*_MSG() variants (that aren't mentioned
elsewhere [1]) which are particularly useful in these situations.
It is also criminally underused at the moment, only appearing in 2
tests (both written by people involved in KUnit).
[1] not even on
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.html
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>