Kai Vehmanen [Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:24:28 +0000 (16:24 +0300)]
ASoC: SOF: Intel: implement runtime idle for CNL/APL
Implement runtime idle for CNL/APL devices using similar runtime
PM idle logic as the Intel AZX HDA driver. If any HDA codecs are
powered when runtime suspend request comes, return -EBUSY. By doing
this, strict ordering is enforced between HDA codec and the HDA
controller.
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190702132428.13129-4-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kai Vehmanen [Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:24:27 +0000 (16:24 +0300)]
ASoC: SOF: add runtime idle callback
Add ability to implement a SOF device level runtime idle callback.
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190702132428.13129-3-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kai Vehmanen [Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:24:26 +0000 (16:24 +0300)]
ASoC: hdac_hdmi: report codec link up/down status to bus
Report codec power status to the HDA codec bus from runtime pm
suspend and resume callbacks. This is required to implement
runtime idle logic that relies on 'codec_powered' field of hdac_bus
to be maintained for all codecs.
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190702132428.13129-2-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Wei Yongjun [Fri, 5 Jul 2019 08:16:37 +0000 (08:16 +0000)]
ASoC: SOF: debug: fix possible memory leak in sof_dfsentry_write()
'string' is malloced in sof_dfsentry_write() and should be freed
before leaving from the error handling cases, otherwise it will cause
memory leak.
Fixes:
091c12e1f50c ("ASoC: SOF: debug: add new debugfs entries for IPC flood test")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190705081637.157169-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Luca Weiss [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:48:11 +0000 (20:48 +0200)]
ASoC: sunxi: sun50i-codec-analog: Add earpiece
This adds the necessary registers and audio routes to play audio using
the Earpiece, that's supported on the A64.
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703184814.27191-1-luca@z3ntu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Colin Ian King [Fri, 5 Jul 2019 07:53:03 +0000 (08:53 +0100)]
ASoC: rt5665: remove redundant assignment to variable idx
The variable idx is being initialized with a value that is never
read and it is being updated later with a new value. The
initialization is redundant and can be removed.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190705075303.14692-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Srinivas Kandagatla [Thu, 4 Jul 2019 16:54:10 +0000 (17:54 +0100)]
ASoC: wcd9335: remove multiple defines.
Found during review that there are multiple defines of same constants.
This patch removes them!
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190704165410.7173-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Srinivas Kandagatla [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:31:02 +0000 (13:31 +0100)]
ASoC: qdsp6: q6afe-dai: Add missing Slimbus0 audio route
For some reason SLIMBus RX0 playback is not added to audio routes.
This patch adds the missing route.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703123102.12626-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Srinivas Kandagatla [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:30:02 +0000 (13:30 +0100)]
ASoC: core: Return -ENOTSUPP from set_channel_map() if no operation provided
It makes it easier for common code to work with snd_soc_dai_set_channel_map()
by distinguishing between operation not being supported and an error.
This is done inline with others snd_soc_dai.* apis.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703123002.12427-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Jerome Brunet [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:07:49 +0000 (14:07 +0200)]
ASoC: meson: axg-tdm-formatter: add reset
Add the optional reset line handling which is present on the new SoC
families, such as the g12a. Triggering this reset is not critical but
it helps solve a channel shift issue on the g12a.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703120749.32341-3-jbrunet@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Jerome Brunet [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:07:48 +0000 (14:07 +0200)]
ASoC: meson: axg-tdm-formatter: add reset to the bindings documentation
Add an optional reset property to the tdm formatter bindings. The
dedicated reset line is present on some SoC families, such as the g12a.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703120749.32341-2-jbrunet@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Mac Chiang [Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:18:33 +0000 (18:18 +0800)]
ASoC: max98357a: avoid speaker pop when playback startup
Loud speaker pop happens during playback even when in slience
playback. Specify Max98357a amp delay times to make sure
clocks are always earlier than sdmode on.
Signed-off-by: Mac Chiang <mac.chiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:10:31 +0000 (13:10 +0900)]
ASoC: pxa: pxa2xx-ac97.c: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:09:50 +0000 (13:09 +0900)]
ASoC: cros_ec_codec: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:09:40 +0000 (13:09 +0900)]
ASoC: ak4118: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.
This patch also removes related empty functions
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:09:28 +0000 (13:09 +0900)]
ASoC: rt5682: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.
This patch also removes related empty functions
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:09:00 +0000 (13:09 +0900)]
ASoC: cirrus: ep93xx-i2s.c: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:08:48 +0000 (13:08 +0900)]
ASoC: au1x: psc-i2s.c: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
YueHaibing [Tue, 2 Jul 2019 06:17:38 +0000 (06:17 +0000)]
ASoC: rt1308: Fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
YueHaibing [Sat, 29 Jun 2019 02:43:33 +0000 (02:43 +0000)]
ASoC: madera: Remove duplicated include from cs47l35.c
Remove duplicated include.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Derek Fang [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:51:43 +0000 (20:51 +0800)]
ASoC: rt1308: Add RT1308 amplifier driver
This is the initial amplifier driver for rt1308.
Signed-off-by: Derek Fang <derek.fang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:50:04 +0000 (10:50 +0900)]
ASoC: soc-utils: respawn dummy Platform
commit
64ee5067cf64 ("ASoC: soc-utils: remove dummy Platform") removed
dummy Platform from ALSA SoC, but it is over-kill.
This patch respawn it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:52 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
961fb3c206dc ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
961fb3c206dc ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:48 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: qcom: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
0814c6412967 ("ASoC: qcom: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
0814c6412967 ("ASoC: qcom: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:44 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: simple-card-utils: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
6f0437445735 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
6f0437445735 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:40 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ux500: mop500: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
9ae6cdb184b6 ("ASoC: ux500: mop500: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
9ae6cdb184b6 ("ASoC: ux500: mop500: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:34 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: rx51: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
f0edc6c1ee48 ("ASoC: ti: rx51: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
f0edc6c1ee48 ("ASoC: ti: rx51: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:30 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
bfe1273c65e1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
bfe1273c65e1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:26 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
edba13aeae88 ("ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
edba13aeae88 ("ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:22 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
1306ab2eddd1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
1306ab2eddd1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:18 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
f46da1b9046e ("ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
f46da1b9046e ("ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:14 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: trimslice: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
567b374d9973 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
567b374d9973 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:10 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
5d62677238e9 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
5d62677238e9 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:06 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
b28d98527157 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
b28d98527157 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:02 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
404b229b84af ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
404b229b84af ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:58 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
cee1cf3f9f9e ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
cee1cf3f9f9e ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:53 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
d035d13b2277 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
d035d13b2277 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:49 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
1d641e1523ca ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
1d641e1523ca ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:45 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:40 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
e7fc99e641da ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
e7fc99e641da ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:35 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
3f780533bac9 ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
3f780533bac9 ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:31 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
e562a5f13c94 ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
e562a5f13c94 ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:27 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
ae7cbcc43b8c ("ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
ae7cbcc43b8c ("ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:23 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: samsung: snow: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:19 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:15 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:01 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:57 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:54 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:50 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: qcom: storm: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:46 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
564684387969 ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
564684387969 ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:42 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
5f92229d184b ("ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
5f92229d184b ("ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:38 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
717f16331712 ("ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
717f16331712 ("ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:35 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
d8893261a7d32 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
d8893261a7d32 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:30 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
014f07ca1cb12 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
014f07ca1cb12 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:26 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
82bf78ca49a3 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
82bf78ca49a3 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:22 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
577cf50d4dc8 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
577cf50d4dc8 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:18 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
e57a4c2f15df27 ("ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
e57a4c2f15df27 ("ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:14 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
2058ea1c4f514a ("ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
2058ea1c4f514a ("ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:10 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:06 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
ced5b08020cd ("ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
ced5b08020cd ("ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:02 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
bfc7938e58142a5 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
bfc7938e58142a5 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:49 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: amtel: mikroe-proto: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
318ebbe8060d96 ("ASoC: atmel: mikroe-proto: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
318ebbe8060d96 ("ASoC: atmel: mikroe-proto: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:37 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: consider CPU-Platform possibility unnecessary Platform"
commit
3609750e9d4ba9db ("ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
3609750e9d4ba9db ("ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:24 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
7baf32e164da5d4 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
7baf32e164da5d4 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:19 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
02602401e5316 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
02602401e5316 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:14 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: vc4: vc4_htmi: consider CPU-Platform possibility
commit
6c6de1c9e2bf2 ("ASoC: vc4: vc4_hdmi: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit
6c6de1c9e2bf2 ("ASoC: vc4: vc4_hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Colin Ian King [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:32:08 +0000 (14:32 +0100)]
ASoC: topology: fix memory leaks on sm, se and sbe
Currently when a kstrdup fails the error exit paths don't free
the allocations for sm, se and sbe. This can be fixed by assigning
kc[i].private_value to these before doing the ksrtdup so that the error
exit path will be able to free these objects.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak")
Fixes:
9f90af3a9952 ("ASoC: topology: Consolidate and fix asoc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create flow")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:07:05 +0000 (13:07 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: atmel-pcm-dma.c: use devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register()
We have devm_xxx version of snd_dmaengine_pcm_register,
let's use it.
This patch also removes related empty functions
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Jerome Brunet [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:17:08 +0000 (10:17 +0200)]
ASoC: meson: axg-card: remove useless check on codec
While checking cpus before dereferencing the pointer is required, it is
not necessary for codecs. 'codec' can't possibly be NULL in the loop
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Jerome Brunet [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:13:50 +0000 (14:13 +0200)]
ASoC: soc-core: support dai_link with platforms_num != 1
Add support platforms_num != 1 in dai_link. Initially, the main purpose of
this change was to make the platform optional in the dai_link, instead of
inserting the dummy platform driver.
This particular case had just been solved by Kuninori Morimoto with
commit
1d7689892878 ("ASoC: soc-core: allow no Platform on dai_link").
However, this change may still be useful for those who need multiple
platform components on a single dai_link (it solves one of the FIXME
note in soc-core)
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Jerome Brunet [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:13:49 +0000 (14:13 +0200)]
ASoC: soc-core: defer card registration if codec component is missing
Like cpus and platforms, defer sound card initialization if the codec
component is missing when initializing the dai_link
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Codrin Ciubotariu [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:02:08 +0000 (15:02 +0300)]
ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Reset used registers at probe
Since the ad193x codecs have no software reset, we have to reinitialize the
registers after a hardware reset to assure no previous values are kept.
Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Codrin Ciubotariu [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:02:07 +0000 (15:02 +0300)]
ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Group register initialization at probe
Create a structure with the register initialization values at probe and
use it to initialize all the registers at once.
Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Mark Brown [Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:39:34 +0000 (12:39 +0100)]
Merge tag 'v5.2-rc6' into asoc-5.3
Linux 5.2-rc6
Kuninori Morimoto [Wed, 26 Jun 2019 01:40:59 +0000 (10:40 +0900)]
ASoC: soc-core: don't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()
commit
b9f2e25c599bb ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at
snd_soc_find_dai()") used soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai(),
but, some CPU driver has CPU component for DAI and Platform component,
for example generic DMAEngine component.
In such case, CPU component and Platform component have same
of_node / name.
Here soc_find_component() returns *1st* found component.
Thus, we shouldn't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai().
This patch fixup this it, and add comment to indicate this limitation.
Fixes: commit
b9f2e25c599bb ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()")
Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Wed, 26 Jun 2019 02:00:05 +0000 (11:00 +0900)]
ASoC: rsnd: add missing pin sharing with SSI9
When SSI9 is sharing pin with SSI0, we need to care about it,
but is missing. This patch fixup it.
Reported-by: Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Chaoliang Qin <chaoliang.qin.jg@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Wed, 26 Jun 2019 01:58:56 +0000 (10:58 +0900)]
ASoC: rsnd: ssiu: tidyup SSI_MODE1/2 settings
R-Car Sound can use pin sharing and multi-SSI for
SSI0/1/2/3/4/9.
Because complex HW settings and spaghetti code,
the settings for SSI9 pin sharing with SSI0 doesn't work.
This patch tidyup settings for it.
Reported-by: Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Chaoliang Qin <chaoliang.qin.jg@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Charles Keepax [Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:37:27 +0000 (16:37 +0100)]
ASoC: madera: Update SPDX headers
The madera driver was merged too late to catch Thomas Gleixner's cleanup
of the SPDX headers tree wide. Update the headers to match what was done
in that patch.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kamil Lulko [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:04:36 +0000 (21:04 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Strip T and L from TLV IPCs
cAVS modules do not require Type and Length header within the
set_module_params IPC. This is also true for Vendor modules. The
userspace (like tinymix) always appends this header to TLV controls
which are used for set_module_params. Simply assume this header is
always present in the payload and omit it from the IPC.
Signed-off-by: Kamil Lulko <kamilx.lulko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:04:35 +0000 (21:04 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Reset pipeline before its deletion
Before actual deletion, pipeline should enter RESET state. Currently,
pipe skips this checkpoint and goes straight to the finish line.
This is not the expected path by the FW, so correct it.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cezary Rojewski [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:04:34 +0000 (21:04 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Common: Fix NULL dereference in tx_wait_done
rx_data and rx_bytes present for tx_wait_done are optional parameters.
If not provided, function should not attempt to copy received data.
This change fixes memcpy NULL pointer dereference issue occurring when
optional rx_data is NULL while received message size is non-zero.
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Gustaw Lewandowski [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:04:33 +0000 (21:04 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Fix race condition in IPC rx list
Since there are multiple IPCs being sent in a short span of time, there
is a possibility of more than one message being on the Rx list after
receiving response from firmware. In such cases, when the first
notification of interrupt from firmware is received, driver retrieves
the message from the Rx list but does not delete it from the list till
the next lock. In the meantime, when another interrupt is received from
the firmware, driver is reading the previous message again since the
previous message has not been removed from the list.
Signed-off-by: Gustaw Lewandowski <gustaw.lewandowski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cezary Rojewski [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:04:32 +0000 (21:04 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Read HIPCT extension before clearing DONE bit
Host clears DONE bit to signal IPC target it has completed the
operation. Once this is done, IPC target i.e. DSP may proceed with the
next reply, filling registers with new portion of data.
Because of this, host should always read all registers prior to clearing
DONE and BUSY bits to ensure no desynchronization happens the time in
between clearing bits and reading message data (here, extension).
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:44 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ASoC: topology: Consolidate and fix asoc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create flow
There are a few soc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create functions with similar
content, but slightly different flow, unify their flow and make sure
that we go to error handler and free memory in case of failure.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:43 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ASoC: topology: Consolidate how dtexts and dvalues are freed
Provide helper functions and use them to free dtexts and dvalues in
topology. This is followup cleanup after related changes in this area as
suggested in:
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-January/144761.html
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:42 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: hdac_hdmi: Set ops to NULL on remove
When we unload Skylake driver we may end up calling
hdac_component_master_unbind(), it uses acomp->audio_ops, which we set
in hdmi_codec_probe(), so we need to set it to NULL in hdmi_codec_remove(),
otherwise we will dereference no longer existing pointer.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:41 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Fix NULL ptr dereference when unloading clk dev
When driver is probed, we iterate over NHLT and check if clk entries are
present. For each such entry we call register_skl_clk and keep the
result in data->clk[].
Currently data->clk is sparsely indexed using NHLT table iterator, while
when freeing we use number of registered entries. Let's just use
data->avail_clk_cnt as index, so it can be reset back in
unregister_src_clk.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:40 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Properly cleanup on component removal
When we remove component we need to reverse things which were done on
init, this consists of topology cleanup, lists cleanup and releasing
firmware.
Currently cleanup handlers are put in wrong places or otherwise missing.
So add proper component cleanup function and perform cleanups in it.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:39 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Add function to cleanup debugfs interface
Currently debugfs has no cleanup function. Add skl_debufs_exit function
so we can clean after ourselves properly.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:37 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Don't return failure on machine driver reload
When we unload and reload machine driver, we shouldn't return that we
failed to initialize. This allows to reload machine driver, without
having to unload whole stack.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:36 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ASoC: compress: Fix memory leak from snd_soc_new_compress
Change kzalloc to devm_kzalloc, so compr gets automatically freed when
it's no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:35 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ALSA: hdac: Fix codec name after machine driver is unloaded and reloaded
Currently on each driver reload internal counter is being increased. It
causes failure to enumerate driver devices, as they have hardcoded:
.codec_name = "ehdaudio0D2",
As there is currently no devices with multiple hda codecs and there is
currently no established way to reliably differentiate, between them,
always assign bus->idx = 0;
This fixes a problem when we unload and reload machine driver idx gets
incremented, so .codec_name would've needed to be set to "ehdaudio1D2"
after first reload and so on.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Amadeusz Sławiński [Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:36:34 +0000 (13:36 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Initialize lists before access so they are safe to use
If skl_probe_work() was not run driver ends up dereferencing NULL
pointer when operating on lists in skl_platform_unregister().
To fix this initialize lists in skl_create(). Also run
cancel_work_sync() before all cleanup functions, so we don't end up
unnecessarily running probe work.
Easily reproducible with:
while true; do modprobe snd_soc_skl; rmmod snd_soc_skl; done
(with the assumption that relevant drivers are added to blacklist on
system boot)
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Paweł Harłoziński [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:04:31 +0000 (21:04 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Use recommended SDxFMT programming sequence
For BXT platforms, the recommended sequence to program the SDxFMT is to
first couple the stream, write the format and decouple again.
For all other platforms said sequence remains unchanged.
To prevent code duplication, IS_BXT (and consequently IS_CFL) macro is
relocated to hda_codec.h file so it can be accessed by SKL driver.
Signed-off-by: Paweł Harłoziński <pawel.harlozinski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Curtis Malainey [Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:52:39 +0000 (13:52 -0700)]
ASoC: rt5677: depop stereo dac
Upon enabling the ASRC DAC we need a delay to avoid popping the
speakers.
Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Enric Balletbo i Serra [Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:58:08 +0000 (17:58 +0200)]
ASoC: rk3399_gru_sound: Support 32, 44.1 and 88.2 kHz sample rates
According to the datasheet the max98357a also supports 32, 44.1 and
88.2 kHz sample rate. This support was also introduced recently by
commit
fdf34366d324 ("ASoC: max98357a: add missing supported rates").
Actually the machine driver validates the supported sample rates but
this is not really needed because the component driver can all apply
whatever constraints are needed and do their own validation. So, remove
the checks from the machine driver as are not needed at all. This way,
we also support 32, 44.1 and 88.2 kHz sample rates and we get rid of the
errors like the below.
rk3399-gru-sound sound: rockchip_sound_max98357a_hw_params() doesn't support this sample rate: 44100
rk3399-gru-sound sound: ASoC: machine hw_params failed: -22
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:49:33 +0000 (09:49 +0900)]
ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()
snd_soc_find_dai() finds component first via specified
snd_soc_dai_link_component, and find DAI from it.
We already have soc_find_component() to find component,
but soc_find_dai() has original implementation to find component.
We shouldn't have duplicate implementation to do same things.
This patch uses soc_find_component() at soc_find_dai()
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:49:27 +0000 (09:49 +0900)]
ASoC: soc-core: soc_find_component() uses snd_soc_dai_link_component
soc_find_component() is using "of_node" and "name" to finding component,
but we should use snd_soc_dai_link_component now, because it is created
to such purpose.
This patch uses snd_soc_dai_link_component for soc_find_component().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto [Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:49:23 +0000 (09:49 +0900)]
ASoC: soc-core: soc_find_component() uses snd_soc_is_matching_component()
ALSA SoC already has snd_soc_is_matching_component() to confirming
matching component, but, soc_find_component() has original
implementation to confirm component.
We shouldn't have duplicate implementation to do same things.
This patch uses snd_soc_is_matching_component() at soc_find_component()
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>