From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 14:32:53 +0000 (-0400) Subject: KVM: x86: check_nested_events is never NULL X-Git-Tag: microblaze-v5.10~663^2~141 X-Git-Url: http://git.monstr.eu/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=56083bdf67c78030f11cdaed5b2b54959a329b02;p=linux-2.6-microblaze.git KVM: x86: check_nested_events is never NULL Both Intel and AMD now implement it, so there is no need to check if the callback is implemented. Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 59958ce2b681..0492baeb78ab 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -7699,7 +7699,7 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * from L2 to L1 due to pending L1 events which require exit * from L2 to L1. */ - if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && kvm_x86_ops.check_nested_events) { + if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) { r = kvm_x86_ops.check_nested_events(vcpu); if (r != 0) return r; @@ -7761,7 +7761,7 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * proposal and current concerns. Perhaps we should be setting * KVM_REQ_EVENT only on certain events and not unconditionally? */ - if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && kvm_x86_ops.check_nested_events) { + if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) { r = kvm_x86_ops.check_nested_events(vcpu); if (r != 0) return r; @@ -8527,7 +8527,7 @@ static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) static inline bool kvm_vcpu_running(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && kvm_x86_ops.check_nested_events) + if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) kvm_x86_ops.check_nested_events(vcpu); return (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE &&