mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling
authorKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Tue, 6 May 2025 13:32:07 +0000 (16:32 +0300)
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Mon, 12 May 2025 00:26:07 +0000 (17:26 -0700)
The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory
using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to
determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory.

Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on
static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages
to/from the zone.

Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0

The comment around the WARN() explains the problem:

/*
 * Warn about the '-1' case though; since that means a
 * decrement is concurrent with a first (0->1) increment. IOW
 * people are trying to disable something that wasn't yet fully
 * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side.
 */

The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on
microbenchmark.

Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250506133207.1009676-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: dcdfdd40fa82 ("mm: Add support for unaccepted memory")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250506092445.GBaBnVXXyvnazly6iF@fat_crate.local
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [6.5+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
mm/internal.h
mm/mm_init.c
mm/page_alloc.c

index 25a2987..5c7a2b4 100644 (file)
@@ -1590,7 +1590,6 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
 void accept_page(struct page *page);
-void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work);
 #else /* CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY */
 static inline void accept_page(struct page *page)
 {
index 327764c..eedce93 100644 (file)
@@ -1441,7 +1441,6 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_free_lists(struct zone *zone)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->unaccepted_pages);
-       INIT_WORK(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup, unaccepted_cleanup_work);
 #endif
 }
 
index 7248e30..8258349 100644 (file)
@@ -7172,16 +7172,8 @@ bool has_managed_dma(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
 
-/* Counts number of zones with unaccepted pages. */
-static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-
 static bool lazy_accept = true;
 
-void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work)
-{
-       static_branch_dec(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-}
-
 static int __init accept_memory_parse(char *p)
 {
        if (!strcmp(p, "lazy")) {
@@ -7206,11 +7198,7 @@ static bool page_contains_unaccepted(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
 static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags,
                          struct page *page)
 {
-       bool last;
-
        list_del(&page->lru);
-       last = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages);
-
        account_freepages(zone, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
        __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
        __ClearPageUnaccepted(page);
@@ -7219,28 +7207,6 @@ static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags,
        accept_memory(page_to_phys(page), PAGE_SIZE << MAX_PAGE_ORDER);
 
        __free_pages_ok(page, MAX_PAGE_ORDER, FPI_TO_TAIL);
-
-       if (last) {
-               /*
-                * There are two corner cases:
-                *
-                * - If allocation occurs during the CPU bring up,
-                *   static_branch_dec() cannot be used directly as
-                *   it causes a deadlock on cpu_hotplug_lock.
-                *
-                *   Instead, use schedule_work() to prevent deadlock.
-                *
-                * - If allocation occurs before workqueues are initialized,
-                *   static_branch_dec() should be called directly.
-                *
-                *   Workqueues are initialized before CPU bring up, so this
-                *   will not conflict with the first scenario.
-                */
-               if (system_wq)
-                       schedule_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup);
-               else
-                       unaccepted_cleanup_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup);
-       }
 }
 
 void accept_page(struct page *page)
@@ -7277,20 +7243,12 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory_one(struct zone *zone)
        return true;
 }
 
-static inline bool has_unaccepted_memory(void)
-{
-       return static_branch_unlikely(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-}
-
 static bool cond_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
                               int alloc_flags)
 {
        long to_accept, wmark;
        bool ret = false;
 
-       if (!has_unaccepted_memory())
-               return false;
-
        if (list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages))
                return false;
 
@@ -7328,22 +7286,17 @@ static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page)
 {
        struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
        unsigned long flags;
-       bool first = false;
 
        if (!lazy_accept)
                return false;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
-       first = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages);
        list_add_tail(&page->lru, &zone->unaccepted_pages);
        account_freepages(zone, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
        __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
        __SetPageUnaccepted(page);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
 
-       if (first)
-               static_branch_inc(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-
        return true;
 }