arm64: Set the safe value for L1 icache policy
authorSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Fri, 9 Sep 2016 13:07:08 +0000 (14:07 +0100)
committerWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:03:28 +0000 (15:03 +0100)
Right now we use 0 as the safe value for CTR_EL0:L1Ip, which is
not defined at the moment. The safer value for the L1Ip should be
the weakest of the policies, which happens to be AIVIVT. While at it,
fix the comment about safe_val.

Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c

index 23a76dc..bd950b0 100644 (file)
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct arm64_ftr_bits {
        enum ftr_type   type;
        u8              shift;
        u8              width;
-       s64             safe_val; /* safe value for discrete features */
+       s64             safe_val; /* safe value for FTR_EXACT features */
 };
 
 /*
index 9128ced..acd374e 100644 (file)
@@ -150,9 +150,10 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
        ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 1),   /* DminLine */
        /*
         * Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will
-        * make use of *minLine
+        * make use of *minLine.
+        * If we have differing I-cache policies, report it as the weakest - AIVIVT.
         */
-       ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, 14, 2, 0),     /* L1Ip */
+       ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, 14, 2, ICACHE_POLICY_AIVIVT),  /* L1Ip */
        ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 4, 10, 0),        /* RAZ */
        ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 0, 4, 0),    /* IminLine */
        ARM64_FTR_END,