mm/memcontrol: fix wrong statistics in memory.stat

When we calculate total statistics for memcg1_stats and memcg1_events,
we use the the index 'i' in the for loop as the events index.  Actually
we should use memcg1_stats[i] and memcg1_events[i] as the events index.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562116978-19539-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Fixes: 42a300353577 ("mm: memcontrol: fix recursive statistics correctness & scalabilty").
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Yafang Shao <shaoyafang@didiglobal.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ba9138a..591eafa 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3530,12 +3530,13 @@ static int memcg_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
                if (memcg1_stats[i] == MEMCG_SWAP && !do_memsw_account())
                        continue;
                seq_printf(m, "total_%s %llu\n", memcg1_stat_names[i],
-                          (u64)memcg_page_state(memcg, i) * PAGE_SIZE);
+                          (u64)memcg_page_state(memcg, memcg1_stats[i]) *
+                          PAGE_SIZE);
        }
 
        for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(memcg1_events); i++)
                seq_printf(m, "total_%s %llu\n", memcg1_event_names[i],
-                          (u64)memcg_events(memcg, i));
+                          (u64)memcg_events(memcg, memcg1_events[i]));
 
        for (i = 0; i < NR_LRU_LISTS; i++)
                seq_printf(m, "total_%s %llu\n", mem_cgroup_lru_names[i],