The comment for explaining about watermarks-based monitoring part
deactivation is duplicated in two paragraphs. Remove one.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230907022929.91361-11-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* monitoring context are inactive, DAMON stops monitoring either, and just
* repeatedly checks the watermarks.
*
- * If all schemes that registered to a &struct damon_ctx are inactive, DAMON
- * stops monitoring and just repeatedly checks the watermarks.
- *
* Before applying the &action to a memory region, &struct damon_operations
* implementation could check pages of the region and skip &action to respect
* &filters