bus: ti-sysc: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
index c2e3b1c..9df1e67 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
@@ -3111,9 +3111,8 @@ static int sysc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                goto unprepare;
 
        pm_runtime_enable(ddata->dev);
-       error = pm_runtime_get_sync(ddata->dev);
+       error = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ddata->dev);
        if (error < 0) {
-               pm_runtime_put_noidle(ddata->dev);
                pm_runtime_disable(ddata->dev);
                goto unprepare;
        }
@@ -3171,9 +3170,8 @@ static int sysc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
        cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ddata->idle_work);
 
-       error = pm_runtime_get_sync(ddata->dev);
+       error = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ddata->dev);
        if (error < 0) {
-               pm_runtime_put_noidle(ddata->dev);
                pm_runtime_disable(ddata->dev);
                goto unprepare;
        }