drm/i915/tgl: Assume future platforms will inherit TGL's SFC capability

Our usual i915 convention is to assume that future platforms will follow
the same behavior as the latest platform of today.  The VDBOX/SFC
capabilities described here don't seem like something that should be
specific to TGL, so let's future-proof by making the test apply to all
gen12+ platforms.

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191224231521.3430660-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index d87c314..6670a07 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ void intel_device_info_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
                 * hooked up to an SFC (Scaler & Format Converter) unit.
                 * In TGL each VDBOX has access to an SFC.
                 */
-               if (IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv) || logical_vdbox++ % 2 == 0)
+               if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12 || logical_vdbox++ % 2 == 0)
                        RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->vdbox_sfc_access |= BIT(i);
        }
        DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("vdbox enable: %04x, instances: %04lx\n",