s390/bpf: Fix bpf_arch_text_poke() with new_addr == NULL

Thomas Richter reported a crash in linux-next with a backtrace similar
to the following one:

	 [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
	([<000000000031a182>] bpf_trace_run4+0xc2/0x218)
	 [<00000000001d59f4>] __bpf_trace_sched_switch+0x1c/0x28
	 [<0000000000c44a3a>] __schedule+0x43a/0x890
	 [<0000000000c44ef8>] schedule+0x68/0x110
	 [<0000000000c4e5ca>] do_nanosleep+0xa2/0x168
	 [<000000000026e7fe>] hrtimer_nanosleep+0xf6/0x1c0
	 [<000000000026eb6e>] __s390x_sys_nanosleep+0xb6/0xf0
	 [<0000000000c3b81c>] __do_syscall+0x1e4/0x208
	 [<0000000000c50510>] system_call+0x70/0x98
	Last Breaking-Event-Address:
	 [<000003ff7fda1814>] bpf_prog_65e887c70a835bbf_on_switch+0x1a4/0x1f0

The problem is that bpf_arch_text_poke() with new_addr == NULL is
susceptible to the following race condition:

	T1                 T2
        -----------------  -------------------
	plt.target = NULL
	                   entry: brcl 0xf,plt
	entry.mask = 0
	                   lgrl %r1,plt.target
	                   br %r1

Fix by setting PLT target to the instruction following `brcl 0xf,plt`
instead of 0. This way T2 will simply resume the execution of the eBPF
program, which is the desired effect of passing new_addr == NULL.

Fixes: f1d5df84cd8c ("s390/bpf: Implement bpf_arch_text_poke()")
Reported-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230414154755.184502-1-iii@linux.ibm.com

diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index d0846ba..6b1876e 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_plt(void *plt, void *ret, void *target)
 {
        memcpy(plt, bpf_plt, BPF_PLT_SIZE);
        *(void **)((char *)plt + (bpf_plt_ret - bpf_plt)) = ret;
-       *(void **)((char *)plt + (bpf_plt_target - bpf_plt)) = target;
+       *(void **)((char *)plt + (bpf_plt_target - bpf_plt)) = target ?: ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2010,7 +2010,9 @@ int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type t,
        } __packed insn;
        char expected_plt[BPF_PLT_SIZE];
        char current_plt[BPF_PLT_SIZE];
+       char new_plt[BPF_PLT_SIZE];
        char *plt;
+       char *ret;
        int err;
 
        /* Verify the branch to be patched. */
@@ -2032,12 +2034,15 @@ int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type t,
                err = copy_from_kernel_nofault(current_plt, plt, BPF_PLT_SIZE);
                if (err < 0)
                        return err;
-               bpf_jit_plt(expected_plt, (char *)ip + 6, old_addr);
+               ret = (char *)ip + 6;
+               bpf_jit_plt(expected_plt, ret, old_addr);
                if (memcmp(current_plt, expected_plt, BPF_PLT_SIZE))
                        return -EINVAL;
                /* Adjust the call address. */
+               bpf_jit_plt(new_plt, ret, new_addr);
                s390_kernel_write(plt + (bpf_plt_target - bpf_plt),
-                                 &new_addr, sizeof(void *));
+                                 new_plt + (bpf_plt_target - bpf_plt),
+                                 sizeof(void *));
        }
 
        /* Adjust the mask of the branch. */