Revert "net: correct sk_acceptq_is_full()"

This reverts commit f211ac154577ec9ccf07c15f18a6abf0d9bdb4ab.

We had similar attempt in the past, and we reverted it.

History:

64a146513f8f12ba204b7bf5cb7e9505594ead42 [NET]: Revert incorrect accept queue backlog changes.
8488df894d05d6fa41c2bd298c335f944bb0e401 [NET]: Fix bugs in "Whether sock accept queue is full" checking

I am adding a fat comment so that future attempts will
be much harder.

Fixes: f211ac154577 ("net: correct sk_acceptq_is_full()")
Cc: iuyacan <yacanliu@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 3e3a5da..8487f58 100644 (file)
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -934,9 +934,13 @@ static inline void sk_acceptq_added(struct sock *sk)
        WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog, sk->sk_ack_backlog + 1);
 }
 
+/* Note: If you think the test should be:
+ *     return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog) >= READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_ack_backlog);
+ * Then please take a look at commit 64a146513f8f ("[NET]: Revert incorrect accept queue backlog changes.")
+ */
 static inline bool sk_acceptq_is_full(const struct sock *sk)
 {
-       return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog) >= READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_ack_backlog);
+       return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog) > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_ack_backlog);
 }
 
 /*