swiotlb: Mark max_segment with static keyword
authorAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Wed, 2 Sep 2020 17:31:05 +0000 (20:31 +0300)
committerKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:41:31 +0000 (09:41 -0400)
Sparse is not happy about max_segment declaration:

  CHECK   kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:96:14: warning: symbol 'max_segment' was not declared. Should it be static?

Mark it static as suggested.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c

index 6499bda..465a567 100644 (file)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static unsigned int io_tlb_index;
  * Max segment that we can provide which (if pages are contingous) will
  * not be bounced (unless SWIOTLB_FORCE is set).
  */
-unsigned int max_segment;
+static unsigned int max_segment;
 
 /*
  * We need to save away the original address corresponding to a mapped entry