The commits in question do not proove that ACPI IDs exist.
Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doing that
for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI IDs.
The to be removed IDs has been checked against the following resources:
1) DuckDuckGo
2) Google
3) MS catalog: https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx
This gives no useful results in regard to DSDT, moreover, the official
vendor ID in the registry for Lite-On is LCI.
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024191200.229894-23-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ltr501_pm_ops, ltr501_suspend, ltr501_resume);
static const struct acpi_device_id ltr_acpi_match[] = {
- { "LTER0501", ltr501 },
- { "LTER0559", ltr559 },
{ "LTER0301", ltr301 },
{ },
};