timers: Simplify code in run_local_timers()
authorAnna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:05:36 +0000 (10:05 +0100)
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:52:31 +0000 (17:52 +0100)
The logic for raising a softirq the way it is implemented right now, is
readable for two timer bases. When increasing the number of timer bases,
code gets harder to read. With the introduction of the timer migration
hierarchy, there will be three timer bases.

Therefore restructure the code to use a loop. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221090548.36600-9-anna-maria@linutronix.de
kernel/time/timer.c

index 121f5b9..9c8443d 100644 (file)
@@ -2180,16 +2180,14 @@ static void run_local_timers(void)
        struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
 
        hrtimer_run_queues();
-       /* Raise the softirq only if required. */
-       if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
-               if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON))
-                       return;
-               /* CPU is awake, so check the deferrable base. */
-               base++;
-               if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry))
+
+       for (int i = 0; i < NR_BASES; i++, base++) {
+               /* Raise the softirq only if required. */
+               if (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
+                       raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
                        return;
+               }
        }
-       raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
 }
 
 /*