cxgb4: fix regression with HASH tc prio value update
authorRahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:08:59 +0000 (19:38 +0530)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Thu, 3 Jun 2021 22:12:42 +0000 (15:12 -0700)
commit db43b30cd89c ("cxgb4: add ethtool n-tuple filter deletion")
has moved searching for next highest priority HASH filter rule to
cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy(), which searches the rhashtable before the
the rule is removed from it and hence always finds at least 1 entry.
Fix by removing the rule from rhashtable first before calling
cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy() and hence avoid fetching stale info.

Fixes: db43b30cd89c ("cxgb4: add ethtool n-tuple filter deletion")
Signed-off-by: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_tc_flower.c

index 1b88bd1..dd9be22 100644 (file)
@@ -997,20 +997,16 @@ int cxgb4_tc_flower_destroy(struct net_device *dev,
        if (!ch_flower)
                return -ENOENT;
 
+       rhashtable_remove_fast(&adap->flower_tbl, &ch_flower->node,
+                              adap->flower_ht_params);
+
        ret = cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy(dev, ch_flower->fs.tc_prio,
                                      &ch_flower->fs, ch_flower->filter_id);
        if (ret)
-               goto err;
+               netdev_err(dev, "Flow rule destroy failed for tid: %u, ret: %d",
+                          ch_flower->filter_id, ret);
 
-       ret = rhashtable_remove_fast(&adap->flower_tbl, &ch_flower->node,
-                                    adap->flower_ht_params);
-       if (ret) {
-               netdev_err(dev, "Flow remove from rhashtable failed");
-               goto err;
-       }
        kfree_rcu(ch_flower, rcu);
-
-err:
        return ret;
 }