ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue
authorWang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Sat, 29 Mar 2014 01:27:31 +0000 (09:27 +0800)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:16:17 +0000 (16:16 -0400)
The issue raises when adding policy route, specify a particular
NIC as oif, the policy route did not take effect. The reason is
that fl6.oif is not set and route map failed. From the
tcp_v6_send_response function, if the binding address is linklocal,
fl6.oif is set, but not for global address.

Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c

index 10b7c04..5ca56ce 100644 (file)
@@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static const struct tcp_request_sock_ops tcp_request_sock_ipv6_ops = {
 #endif
 
 static void tcp_v6_send_response(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack, u32 win,
-                                u32 tsval, u32 tsecr,
+                                u32 tsval, u32 tsecr, int oif,
                                 struct tcp_md5sig_key *key, int rst, u8 tclass,
                                 u32 label)
 {
@@ -798,8 +798,10 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_response(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack, u32 win,
        __tcp_v6_send_check(buff, &fl6.saddr, &fl6.daddr);
 
        fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
-       if (ipv6_addr_type(&fl6.daddr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)
+       if (rt6_need_strict(&fl6.daddr) || !oif)
                fl6.flowi6_oif = inet6_iif(skb);
+       else
+               fl6.flowi6_oif = oif;
        fl6.fl6_dport = t1->dest;
        fl6.fl6_sport = t1->source;
        security_skb_classify_flow(skb, flowi6_to_flowi(&fl6));
@@ -833,6 +835,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
        int genhash;
        struct sock *sk1 = NULL;
 #endif
+       int oif;
 
        if (th->rst)
                return;
@@ -876,7 +879,8 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
                ack_seq = ntohl(th->seq) + th->syn + th->fin + skb->len -
                          (th->doff << 2);
 
-       tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack_seq, 0, 0, 0, key, 1, 0, 0);
+       oif = sk ? sk->sk_bound_dev_if : 0;
+       tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack_seq, 0, 0, 0, oif, key, 1, 0, 0);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
 release_sk1:
@@ -888,11 +892,11 @@ release_sk1:
 }
 
 static void tcp_v6_send_ack(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack,
-                           u32 win, u32 tsval, u32 tsecr,
+                           u32 win, u32 tsval, u32 tsecr, int oif,
                            struct tcp_md5sig_key *key, u8 tclass,
                            u32 label)
 {
-       tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack, win, tsval, tsecr, key, 0, tclass,
+       tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack, win, tsval, tsecr, oif, key, 0, tclass,
                             label);
 }
 
@@ -904,7 +908,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_timewait_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
        tcp_v6_send_ack(skb, tcptw->tw_snd_nxt, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt,
                        tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd >> tw->tw_rcv_wscale,
                        tcp_time_stamp + tcptw->tw_ts_offset,
-                       tcptw->tw_ts_recent, tcp_twsk_md5_key(tcptw),
+                       tcptw->tw_ts_recent, tw->tw_bound_dev_if, tcp_twsk_md5_key(tcptw),
                        tw->tw_tclass, (tw->tw_flowlabel << 12));
 
        inet_twsk_put(tw);
@@ -914,7 +918,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_reqsk_send_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
                                  struct request_sock *req)
 {
        tcp_v6_send_ack(skb, tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn + 1, tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1,
-                       req->rcv_wnd, tcp_time_stamp, req->ts_recent,
+                       req->rcv_wnd, tcp_time_stamp, req->ts_recent, sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
                        tcp_v6_md5_do_lookup(sk, &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr),
                        0, 0);
 }