LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization
authorKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:18:17 +0000 (17:18 -0700)
committerJames Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
Thu, 11 Oct 2018 03:40:21 +0000 (20:40 -0700)
For a while now, the LSM core has said it was "initializED", rather than
"initializING". This adjust the report to be more accurate (i.e. before
this was reported before any LSMs had been initialized.)

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
security/security.c

index 736e78d..4cbcf24 100644 (file)
@@ -72,10 +72,11 @@ int __init security_init(void)
        int i;
        struct hlist_head *list = (struct hlist_head *) &security_hook_heads;
 
+       pr_info("Security Framework initializing\n");
+
        for (i = 0; i < sizeof(security_hook_heads) / sizeof(struct hlist_head);
             i++)
                INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&list[i]);
-       pr_info("Security Framework initialized\n");
 
        /*
         * Load minor LSMs, with the capability module always first.