mm/swap: fix confusing comment in folio_mark_accessed
authorBang Li <libang.linuxer@gmail.com>
Tue, 22 Mar 2022 21:39:52 +0000 (14:39 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:57:01 +0000 (15:57 -0700)
For unevictable pages, we don't need mark them.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220311141519.59948-1-libang.linuxer@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Bang Li <libang.linuxer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
mm/swap.c

index bcf3ac2..e9786c4 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ void folio_mark_accessed(struct folio *folio)
                /*
                 * Unevictable pages are on the "LRU_UNEVICTABLE" list. But,
                 * this list is never rotated or maintained, so marking an
-                * evictable page accessed has no effect.
+                * unevictable page accessed has no effect.
                 */
        } else if (!folio_test_active(folio)) {
                /*