Seeing a burst of messages like this:
vfio-pci 0000:98:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x19@0x1d0
vfio-pci 0000:98:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x25@0x200
vfio-pci 0000:98:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x26@0x210
vfio-pci 0000:98:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x27@0x250
vfio-pci 0000:98:00.1: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x25@0x200
vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x19@0x1d0
vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x25@0x200
vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x26@0x210
vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x27@0x250
vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.1: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x25@0x200
is of little to no value for an ordinary user.
Hence, use pci_dbg() instead of pci_info().
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Acked-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Tested-by: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230504131654.24922-1-oleksandr@natalenko.name
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
}
if (!len) {
- pci_info(pdev, "%s: hiding ecap %#x@%#x\n",
- __func__, ecap, epos);
+ pci_dbg(pdev, "%s: hiding ecap %#x@%#x\n",
+ __func__, ecap, epos);
/* If not the first in the chain, we can skip over it */
if (prev) {