There is a bug that checking the same active_list over and over again
in iocg_activate(). The intention of the code was checking whether all
the ancestors and self have already been activated. So fix it.
Fixes:
7caa47151ab2 ("blkcg: implement blk-iocost")
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
atomic64_set(&iocg->active_period, cur_period);
/* already activated or breaking leaf-only constraint? */
- for (i = iocg->level; i > 0; i--)
- if (!list_empty(&iocg->active_list))
+ if (!list_empty(&iocg->active_list))
+ goto succeed_unlock;
+ for (i = iocg->level - 1; i > 0; i--)
+ if (!list_empty(&iocg->ancestors[i]->active_list))
goto fail_unlock;
+
if (iocg->child_active_sum)
goto fail_unlock;
ioc_start_period(ioc, now);
}
+succeed_unlock:
spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
return true;