ipv6: A few fixes on dereferencing rt->from

It is a followup after the fix in
commit 9c69a1320515 ("route: Avoid crash from dereferencing NULL rt->from")

rt6_do_redirect():
1. NULL checking is needed on rt->from because a parallel
   fib6_info delete could happen that sets rt->from to NULL.
   (e.g. rt6_remove_exception() and fib6_drop_pcpu_from()).

2. fib6_info_hold() is not enough.  Same reason as (1).
   Meaning, holding dst->__refcnt cannot ensure
   rt->from is not NULL or rt->from->fib6_ref is not 0.

   Instead of using fib6_info_hold_safe() which ip6_rt_cache_alloc()
   is already doing, this patch chooses to extend the rcu section
   to keep "from" dereference-able after checking for NULL.

inet6_rtm_getroute():
1. NULL checking is also needed on rt->from for a similar reason.
   Note that inet6_rtm_getroute() is using RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED.

Fixes: a68886a69180 ("net/ipv6: Make from in rt6_info rcu protected")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 2cc166b..0520aca 100644 (file)
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -3392,11 +3392,8 @@ static void rt6_do_redirect(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
 
        rcu_read_lock();
        from = rcu_dereference(rt->from);
-       /* This fib6_info_hold() is safe here because we hold reference to rt
-        * and rt already holds reference to fib6_info.
-        */
-       fib6_info_hold(from);
-       rcu_read_unlock();
+       if (!from)
+               goto out;
 
        nrt = ip6_rt_cache_alloc(from, &msg->dest, NULL);
        if (!nrt)
@@ -3408,10 +3405,7 @@ static void rt6_do_redirect(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
 
        nrt->rt6i_gateway = *(struct in6_addr *)neigh->primary_key;
 
-       /* No need to remove rt from the exception table if rt is
-        * a cached route because rt6_insert_exception() will
-        * takes care of it
-        */
+       /* rt6_insert_exception() will take care of duplicated exceptions */
        if (rt6_insert_exception(nrt, from)) {
                dst_release_immediate(&nrt->dst);
                goto out;
@@ -3424,7 +3418,7 @@ static void rt6_do_redirect(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
        call_netevent_notifiers(NETEVENT_REDIRECT, &netevent);
 
 out:
-       fib6_info_release(from);
+       rcu_read_unlock();
        neigh_release(neigh);
 }
 
@@ -5023,16 +5017,20 @@ static int inet6_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
        rcu_read_lock();
        from = rcu_dereference(rt->from);
-
-       if (fibmatch)
-               err = rt6_fill_node(net, skb, from, NULL, NULL, NULL, iif,
-                                   RTM_NEWROUTE, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid,
-                                   nlh->nlmsg_seq, 0);
-       else
-               err = rt6_fill_node(net, skb, from, dst, &fl6.daddr,
-                                   &fl6.saddr, iif, RTM_NEWROUTE,
-                                   NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid, nlh->nlmsg_seq,
-                                   0);
+       if (from) {
+               if (fibmatch)
+                       err = rt6_fill_node(net, skb, from, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+                                           iif, RTM_NEWROUTE,
+                                           NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid,
+                                           nlh->nlmsg_seq, 0);
+               else
+                       err = rt6_fill_node(net, skb, from, dst, &fl6.daddr,
+                                           &fl6.saddr, iif, RTM_NEWROUTE,
+                                           NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid,
+                                           nlh->nlmsg_seq, 0);
+       } else {
+               err = -ENETUNREACH;
+       }
        rcu_read_unlock();
 
        if (err < 0) {