drm/i915: flush delayed_resume_work when suspending

It is possible that, by the time we run i915_drm_freeze(),
delayed_resume_work was already queued but did not run yet. If it
still didn't run after intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(), by the
time it runs it will try to change the interrupt registers with the
interrupts already disabled, which will trigger a WARN. We can
reliably reproduce this with the pm_rpm system-suspend test case.

In order to avoid the problem, we have to flush the work before
disabling the interrupts. We could also cancel the work instead of
flushing it, but that would require us to put a runtime PM reference -
and any other resource we may need in the future - in case the work
was already queued, so I believe flushing the work is more
future-proof, although less efficient. But I can also change this part
if someone requests.

Another thing I tried was to move the intel_suspend_gt_powersave()
call to before intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(), but since that
function needs to be called after the interrupts are already disabled,
due to dev_priv->rps.work, this strategy didn't work.

Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/system-suspend
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80517
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 6eb45ac..8a0cb0c 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -520,6 +520,8 @@ static int i915_drm_freeze(struct drm_device *dev)
                        return error;
                }
 
+               flush_delayed_work(&dev_priv->rps.delayed_resume_work);
+
                intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(dev);
                dev_priv->enable_hotplug_processing = false;