xfs: extent shifting doesn't fully invalidate page cache
authorDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:31:09 +0000 (13:31 -0800)
committerDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:36:19 +0000 (10:36 -0800)
The extent shifting code uses a flush and invalidate mechainsm prior
to shifting extents around. This is similar to what
xfs_free_file_space() does, but it doesn't take into account things
like page cache vs block size differences, and it will fail if there
is a page that it currently busy.

xfs_flush_unmap_range() handles all of these cases, so just convert
xfs_prepare_shift() to us that mechanism rather than having it's own
special sauce.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c

index 5d263df..167ff42 100644 (file)
@@ -1195,13 +1195,7 @@ xfs_prepare_shift(
         * Writeback and invalidate cache for the remainder of the file as we're
         * about to shift down every extent from offset to EOF.
         */
-       error = filemap_write_and_wait_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping, offset, -1);
-       if (error)
-               return error;
-       error = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
-                                       offset >> PAGE_SHIFT, -1);
-       if (error)
-               return error;
+       error = xfs_flush_unmap_range(ip, offset, XFS_ISIZE(ip));
 
        /*
         * Clean out anything hanging around in the cow fork now that