signature in their "security.ima" extended attribute, as controlled
by the IMA policy. For more information, see the IMA documentation.
+- Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE). IPE supports enforcing access
+ control decisions based on immutable security properties of files,
+ including those protected by fs-verity's built-in signatures.
+ "IPE policy" specifically allows for the authorization of fs-verity
+ files using properties ``fsverity_digest`` for identifying
+ files by their verity digest, and ``fsverity_signature`` to authorize
+ files with a verified fs-verity's built-in signature.
+
- Trusted userspace code in combination with `Built-in signature
verification`_. This approach should be used only with great care.
On success, the ioctl persists the signature alongside the Merkle
tree. Then, any time the file is opened, the kernel verifies the
file's actual digest against this signature, using the certificates
- in the ".fs-verity" keyring.
+ in the ".fs-verity" keyring. This verification happens as long as the
+ file's signature exists, regardless of the state of the sysctl variable
+ "fs.verity.require_signatures" described in the next item. The IPE LSM
+ relies on this behavior to recognize and label fsverity files
+ that contain a verified built-in fsverity signature.
3. A new sysctl "fs.verity.require_signatures" is made available.
When set to 1, the kernel requires that all verity files have a
- Builtin signature verification does *not* make the kernel enforce
that any files actually have fs-verity enabled. Thus, it is not a
- complete authentication policy. Currently, if it is used, the only
+ complete authentication policy. Currently, if it is used, one
way to complete the authentication policy is for trusted userspace
code to explicitly check whether files have fs-verity enabled with a
signature before they are accessed. (With
could just store the signature alongside the file and verify it
itself using a cryptographic library, instead of using this feature.
+- Another approach is to utilize fs-verity builtin signature
+ verification in conjunction with the IPE LSM, which supports defining
+ a kernel-enforced, system-wide authentication policy that allows only
+ files with a verified fs-verity builtin signature to perform certain
+ operations, such as execution. Note that IPE doesn't require
+ fs.verity.require_signatures=1.
+
- A file's builtin signature can only be set at the same time that
fs-verity is being enabled on the file. Changing or deleting the
builtin signature later requires re-creating the file.
#include <linux/cred.h>
#include <linux/key.h>
+#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/verification.h>
* @sig_size: size of signature in bytes, or 0 if no signature
*
* If the file includes a signature of its fs-verity file digest, verify it
- * against the certificates in the fs-verity keyring.
+ * against the certificates in the fs-verity keyring. Note that signatures
+ * are verified regardless of the state of the 'fsverity_require_signatures'
+ * variable and the LSM subsystem relies on this behavior to help enforce
+ * file integrity policies. Please discuss changes with the LSM list
+ * (thank you!).
*
* Return: 0 on success (signature valid or not required); -errno on failure
*/
return err;
}
+ err = security_inode_setintegrity(inode,
+ LSM_INT_FSVERITY_BUILTINSIG_VALID,
+ signature,
+ sig_size);
+
+ if (err) {
+ fsverity_err(inode, "Error %d exposing file signature to LSMs",
+ err);
+ return err;
+ }
+
return 0;
}