Kuniyuki Iwashima says:
====================
dev: Covnert dev_change_name() to per-netns RTNL.
Patch 1 adds a missing netdev_rename_lock in dev_change_name()
and Patch 2 removes unnecessary devnet_rename_sem there.
Patch 3 replaces RTNL with rtnl_net_lock() in dev_ifsioc(),
and now dev_change_name() is always called under per-netns RTNL.
Given it's close to -rc8 and Patch 1 touches the trivial unlikely
path, can Patch 1 go into net-next ? Otherwise I'll post Patch 2 & 3
separately in the next cycle.
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250115095545.52709-1-kuniyu@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>