drm/i915/shrinker: Wrap need_resched() inside preempt-disable
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fri, 4 Aug 2017 10:41:35 +0000 (11:41 +0100)
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fri, 4 Aug 2017 12:11:39 +0000 (13:11 +0100)
In order for us to successfully detect the end of a timeslice,
preemption must be disabled. Otherwise, inside the loop we may be
preempted many times without our noticing, and each time our timeslice
will be reset, invalidating need_resched()

Reported-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
Fixes: 290271de34f6 ("drm/i915: Spin for struct_mutex inside shrinker")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.13-rc1+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170804104135.26805-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Tested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c

index 1032f98..77fb398 100644 (file)
@@ -43,16 +43,21 @@ static bool shrinker_lock(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool *unlock)
                return true;
 
        case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_FAILED:
+               *unlock = false;
+               preempt_disable();
                do {
                        cpu_relax();
                        if (mutex_trylock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex)) {
-       case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_SUCCESS:
                                *unlock = true;
-                               return true;
+                               break;
                        }
                } while (!need_resched());
+               preempt_enable();
+               return *unlock;
 
-               return false;
+       case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_SUCCESS:
+               *unlock = true;
+               return true;
        }
 
        BUG();