kernel/user.c: clean up some leftover code
authorRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Tue, 14 May 2019 22:42:37 +0000 (15:42 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Wed, 15 May 2019 02:52:49 +0000 (19:52 -0700)
The out_unlock label is misleading; no unlocking happens after it, so
just return NULL directly.

Also, nothing between the kmem_cache_zalloc() that creates new and the
two key_put() can initialize new->uid_keyring or new->session_keyring,
so those calls are no-ops.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190424200404.9114-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
kernel/user.c

index 0df9b16..88b834f 100644 (file)
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ struct user_struct *alloc_uid(kuid_t uid)
        if (!up) {
                new = kmem_cache_zalloc(uid_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
                if (!new)
-                       goto out_unlock;
+                       return NULL;
 
                new->uid = uid;
                refcount_set(&new->__count, 1);
@@ -199,8 +199,6 @@ struct user_struct *alloc_uid(kuid_t uid)
                spin_lock_irq(&uidhash_lock);
                up = uid_hash_find(uid, hashent);
                if (up) {
-                       key_put(new->uid_keyring);
-                       key_put(new->session_keyring);
                        kmem_cache_free(uid_cachep, new);
                } else {
                        uid_hash_insert(new, hashent);
@@ -210,9 +208,6 @@ struct user_struct *alloc_uid(kuid_t uid)
        }
 
        return up;
-
-out_unlock:
-       return NULL;
 }
 
 static int __init uid_cache_init(void)