Here is a link to Linus' reply to Jan's concern about making
i_blkbibts byte addressable:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=
152882624707975&w=2
Here is a link to an lkp.org report about potential performance
improvement in some workload, which could(?) be related to packing
i_blkbits closer to i_bytes/i_lock:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=
153077048108198&w=2
Changes since v1:
- Add links to relevant discussions
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
/*
* Write life time hint values.
+ * Stored in struct inode as u8.
*/
enum rw_hint {
WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET = 0,
struct timespec64 i_ctime;
spinlock_t i_lock; /* i_blocks, i_bytes, maybe i_size */
unsigned short i_bytes;
- unsigned int i_blkbits;
- enum rw_hint i_write_hint;
+ u8 i_blkbits;
+ u8 i_write_hint;
blkcnt_t i_blocks;
#ifdef __NEED_I_SIZE_ORDERED