Currently we check if the __ICE_PREPARED_FOR_RESET bit is set prior to
calling ice_prepare_for_reset in ice_reset_subtask(), but we aren't
checking that bit in ice_do_reset() before calling
ice_prepare_for_reset(). This is not consistent and can cause issues if
ice_prepare_for_reset() is called prior to ice_do_reset(). Fix this by
checking if the __ICE_PREPARED_FOR_RESET bit is set internal to
ice_prepare_for_reset().
Signed-off-by: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
{
struct ice_hw *hw = &pf->hw;
+ /* already prepared for reset */
+ if (test_bit(__ICE_PREPARED_FOR_RESET, pf->state))
+ return;
+
/* Notify VFs of impending reset */
if (ice_check_sq_alive(hw, &hw->mailboxq))
ice_vc_notify_reset(pf);
/* return if no valid reset type requested */
if (reset_type == ICE_RESET_INVAL)
return;
- if (!test_bit(__ICE_PREPARED_FOR_RESET, pf->state))
- ice_prepare_for_reset(pf);
+ ice_prepare_for_reset(pf);
/* make sure we are ready to rebuild */
if (ice_check_reset(&pf->hw)) {