nvmem: qfprom: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
authorMinghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:26:54 +0000 (17:26 +0100)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Mon, 9 May 2022 13:45:39 +0000 (15:45 +0200)
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220429162701.2222-10-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c

index 162132c..c1e893c 100644 (file)
@@ -217,9 +217,8 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
                goto err_clk_rate_set;
        }
 
-       ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
+       ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(priv->dev);
        if (ret < 0) {
-               pm_runtime_put_noidle(priv->dev);
                dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable power-domain\n");
                goto err_reg_enable;
        }