bpf: fix sanitation rewrite in case of non-pointers
authorDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Fri, 1 Mar 2019 21:05:29 +0000 (22:05 +0100)
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Sat, 2 Mar 2019 05:24:08 +0000 (21:24 -0800)
Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that
timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while results
were reasonable when loaded as privileged:

    [...]
    uint64_t a = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
    uint64_t b = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
    uint64_t delta = b - a;
    if ((int64_t)delta > 0) {
    [...]

Turns out there is a bug where a corner case is missing in the fix
d3bd7413e0ca ("bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar
type from different paths"), namely fixup_bpf_calls() only checks
whether aux has a non-zero alu_state, but it also needs to test for
the case of BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER since in both occasions we need to
skip the masking rewrite (as there is nothing to mask).

Fixes: d3bd7413e0ca ("bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths")
Reported-by: Marek Majkowski <marek@cloudflare.com>
Reported-by: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAJPywTJqP34cK20iLM5YmUMz9KXQOdu1-+BZrGMAGgLuBWz7fg@mail.gmail.com/T/
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
kernel/bpf/verifier.c

index 8f295b7..5fcce2f 100644 (file)
@@ -6920,7 +6920,8 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
                        u32 off_reg;
 
                        aux = &env->insn_aux_data[i + delta];
-                       if (!aux->alu_state)
+                       if (!aux->alu_state ||
+                           aux->alu_state == BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER)
                                continue;
 
                        isneg = aux->alu_state & BPF_ALU_NEG_VALUE;