btrfs: use nodesize to determine if we need readahead in btrfs_lookup_bio_sums

In btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() if the bio is pretty large, we want to
start readahead in the csum tree.

However the threshold is an immediate number, (PAGE_SIZE * 8), from the
initial btrfs merge.

The meaning of the value is pretty hard to guess, especially when the
immediate number is from the times when 4K sectorsize was the default
and only CRC32C was supported.

For the most common btrfs setup, CRC32 csum and 4K sectorsize,
it means just 32K read would kick readahead, while the csum itself is
only 32 bytes in size.

Now let's be more reasonable by taking both csum size and node size into
consideration.

If the csum size for the bio is larger than one leaf, then we kick the
readahead.  This means for current default btrfs, the threshold will be
16M.

This change should not change performance observably, thus this is
mostly a readability enhancement.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
index 1a5651b..6086e4c 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
@@ -297,7 +297,11 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
                csum = dst;
        }
 
-       if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > PAGE_SIZE * 8)
+       /*
+        * If requested number of sectors is larger than one leaf can contain,
+        * kick the readahead for csum tree.
+        */
+       if (nblocks > fs_info->csums_per_leaf)
                path->reada = READA_FORWARD;
 
        /*