This is to match ipv4 behaviour, see __ip_sock_set_tos()
implementation.
Technically for ipv6 this might not be required because normally we
do not allow tclass to influence routing, yet the cli tooling does
support it:
lpk11:~# ip -6 rule add pref 5 tos 45 lookup 5
lpk11:~# ip -6 rule
5: from all tos 0x45 lookup 5
and in general dscp/tclass based routing does make sense.
We already have cases where dscp can affect vlan priority and/or
transmit queue (especially on wifi).
So let's just make things match. Easier to reason about and no harm.
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211123223208.1117871-1-zenczykowski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
val &= ~INET_ECN_MASK;
val |= np->tclass & INET_ECN_MASK;
}
- np->tclass = val;
+ if (np->tclass != val) {
+ np->tclass = val;
+ sk_dst_reset(sk);
+ }
retv = 0;
break;