Per the example of:
!atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 0, 1)
the inverse was written as:
atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0)
except of course, that while !old is only true for old == 0, old is
true for everything except old == 0.
Fix it to read:
atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1
such that only the 1->0 transition returns true and goes on to disable
the keys.
Fixes:
83ab38ef0a0b ("jump_label: Fix concurrency issues in static_key_slow_dec()")
Reported-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240731105557.GY33588@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
}
jump_label_lock();
- if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0))
+ if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1)
jump_label_update(key);
jump_label_unlock();
}
return;
guard(mutex)(&jump_label_mutex);
- if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0))
+ if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1)
jump_label_update(key);
else
WARN_ON_ONCE(!static_key_slow_try_dec(key));