iwlagn: move the Rx dispatching to the upper layer
authorEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:59:02 +0000 (07:59 -0700)
committerWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:37:06 +0000 (07:37 -0700)
The upper layer receives a pointer to an iwl_rx_mem_buffer. I would prefer the
upper layer to receive a pointer to an iwl_rx_packet, but this is impossible
since the Rx path needs to add the address of the page to the skb.
I may find a solution later.

All the pre_rx_handler and notification code has been moved to the upper layer.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.h
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c

index c91e010..ba4e2a8 100644 (file)
@@ -513,6 +513,9 @@ static void iwl_rx_handle(struct iwl_priv *priv)
                               DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
                pkt = rxb_addr(rxb);
 
+               IWL_DEBUG_RX(priv, "r = %d, i = %d, %s, 0x%02x\n", r,
+                       i, get_cmd_string(pkt->hdr.cmd), pkt->hdr.cmd);
+
                len = le32_to_cpu(pkt->len_n_flags) & FH_RSCSR_FRAME_SIZE_MSK;
                len += sizeof(u32); /* account for status word */
                trace_iwlwifi_dev_rx(priv, pkt, len);
@@ -531,44 +534,7 @@ static void iwl_rx_handle(struct iwl_priv *priv)
                        (pkt->hdr.cmd != STATISTICS_NOTIFICATION) &&
                        (pkt->hdr.cmd != REPLY_TX);
 
-               /*
-                * Do the notification wait before RX handlers so
-                * even if the RX handler consumes the RXB we have
-                * access to it in the notification wait entry.
-                */
-               if (!list_empty(&priv->_agn.notif_waits)) {
-                       struct iwl_notification_wait *w;
-
-                       spin_lock(&priv->_agn.notif_wait_lock);
-                       list_for_each_entry(w, &priv->_agn.notif_waits, list) {
-                               if (w->cmd == pkt->hdr.cmd) {
-                                       w->triggered = true;
-                                       if (w->fn)
-                                               w->fn(priv, pkt, w->fn_data);
-                               }
-                       }
-                       spin_unlock(&priv->_agn.notif_wait_lock);
-
-                       wake_up_all(&priv->_agn.notif_waitq);
-               }
-               if (priv->pre_rx_handler)
-                       priv->pre_rx_handler(priv, rxb);
-
-               /* Based on type of command response or notification,
-                *   handle those that need handling via function in
-                *   rx_handlers table.  See iwl_setup_rx_handlers() */
-               if (priv->rx_handlers[pkt->hdr.cmd]) {
-                       IWL_DEBUG_RX(priv, "r = %d, i = %d, %s, 0x%02x\n", r,
-                               i, get_cmd_string(pkt->hdr.cmd), pkt->hdr.cmd);
-                       priv->isr_stats.rx_handlers[pkt->hdr.cmd]++;
-                       priv->rx_handlers[pkt->hdr.cmd] (priv, rxb);
-               } else {
-                       /* No handling needed */
-                       IWL_DEBUG_RX(priv,
-                               "r %d i %d No handler needed for %s, 0x%02x\n",
-                               r, i, get_cmd_string(pkt->hdr.cmd),
-                               pkt->hdr.cmd);
-               }
+               iwl_rx_dispatch(priv, rxb);
 
                /*
                 * XXX: After here, we should always check rxb->page
index fe5451e..666376e 100644 (file)
@@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ void iwlagn_rx_replenish(struct iwl_priv *priv);
 void iwlagn_rx_replenish_now(struct iwl_priv *priv);
 int iwlagn_hwrate_to_mac80211_idx(u32 rate_n_flags, enum ieee80211_band band);
 void iwl_setup_rx_handlers(struct iwl_priv *priv);
+void iwl_rx_dispatch(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb);
+
 
 /* tx */
 void iwlagn_txq_free_tfd(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_tx_queue *txq,
index f3f3efe..c5eb379 100644 (file)
@@ -1105,3 +1105,49 @@ void iwl_setup_rx_handlers(struct iwl_priv *priv)
        /* Set up hardware specific Rx handlers */
        priv->cfg->ops->lib->rx_handler_setup(priv);
 }
+
+void iwl_rx_dispatch(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb)
+{
+       struct iwl_rx_packet *pkt = rxb_addr(rxb);
+
+       /*
+        * Do the notification wait before RX handlers so
+        * even if the RX handler consumes the RXB we have
+        * access to it in the notification wait entry.
+        */
+       if (!list_empty(&priv->_agn.notif_waits)) {
+               struct iwl_notification_wait *w;
+
+               spin_lock(&priv->_agn.notif_wait_lock);
+               list_for_each_entry(w, &priv->_agn.notif_waits, list) {
+                       if (w->cmd != pkt->hdr.cmd)
+                               continue;
+                       IWL_DEBUG_RX(priv,
+                               "Notif: %s, 0x%02x - wake the callers up\n",
+                               get_cmd_string(pkt->hdr.cmd),
+                               pkt->hdr.cmd);
+                       w->triggered = true;
+                       if (w->fn)
+                               w->fn(priv, pkt, w->fn_data);
+               }
+               spin_unlock(&priv->_agn.notif_wait_lock);
+
+               wake_up_all(&priv->_agn.notif_waitq);
+       }
+
+       if (priv->pre_rx_handler)
+               priv->pre_rx_handler(priv, rxb);
+
+       /* Based on type of command response or notification,
+        *   handle those that need handling via function in
+        *   rx_handlers table.  See iwl_setup_rx_handlers() */
+       if (priv->rx_handlers[pkt->hdr.cmd]) {
+               priv->isr_stats.rx_handlers[pkt->hdr.cmd]++;
+               priv->rx_handlers[pkt->hdr.cmd] (priv, rxb);
+       } else {
+               /* No handling needed */
+               IWL_DEBUG_RX(priv,
+                       "No handler needed for %s, 0x%02x\n",
+                       get_cmd_string(pkt->hdr.cmd), pkt->hdr.cmd);
+       }
+}